Blanchard (1989) proposed that male-to-female (MtF) transsexuals could be categorized into two groups: those who are androphilic (sexually attracted to men) and those who experience autogynephilia (sexual arousal from the thought of being a woman). This classification has influenced discussions on gender identity and the etiology of gender dysphoria. However, critics argue that the concept oversimplifies the experiences of transgender individuals and may contribute to stigma.
Psychological and Clinical Considerations
Studies have examined the prevalence and psychological impact of autogynephilia. Lawrence (2017) reviewed empirical evidence supporting Blanchard’s typology, noting that nonandrophilic MtF individuals often report autogynephilic fantasies. However, other researchers, such as Veale et al. (2023), have challenged the framework, suggesting that gender identity development is more complex than Blanchard’s model implies.
Controversies and Ethical Considerations
The concept of autogynephilia remains controversial (e.g., Moser, 2010; Serano, 2010; Veale et al., 2012). Transexual respondents reported mixed feelings about the theory of autogynephilic transsexualism (Lawrence, 2012).
Conclusion
Autogynephilia continues to be a debated topic in psychology and gender studies. While some empirical studies support its existence as a distinct phenomenon, others question its validity and ethical implications. Further research is needed to clarify its role in gender identity and sexual orientation.
Related Post
Autoandrophilia. https://suttonpsychology.blogspot.com/2025/06/autoandrophilia-psychological.html
References
See these sources and their references to learn more about Blanchard's theory and the comments of other researchers.
Blanchard, R. (1989). The concept of autogynephilia and its implications for gender identity. Journal of Sex Research, 26 (4), 519–534. DOI: 10.1097/00005053-198910000-00004
Lawrence, A. A. (2017). Autogynephilia and the typology of male-to-female transsexualism: Concepts and controversies. European Psychologist, 22(1), 39–54. https://psycnet.apa.org/record/2017-38120-004 [And: No authorship indicated. (2017). “Autogynephilia and the typology of male-to-female transsexualism: Concepts and controversies”: Correction to Anne A. Lawrence, 2017. European Psychologist, 22(2), 139. https://doi.org/10.1027/1016-9040/a000290 ]
Lawrence, A.A. (2012). Confronting Autogynephilia. In: Men Trapped in Men's Bodies. Focus on Sexuality Research. Springer https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-5182-2_4
Moser, C. (2010). Blanchard’s Autogynephilia Theory: A critique. Journal of Homosexuality, 57(6), 790–809. https://doi.org/10.1080/00918369.2010.486241
Serano, J. M. (2010). The Case Against Autogynephilia. International Journal of Transgenderism, 12(3), 176–187. https://doi.org/10.1080/15532739.2010.514223
Veale, J. F., Clarke, D. E., & Lomax, T. C. (2012). Male-to-Female Transsexuals’ Impressions of Blanchard’s Autogynephilia Theory. International Journal of Transgenderism, 13(3), 131–139. https://doi.org/10.1080/15532739.2011.669659
Veale, J.F., Clarke, D.E. & Lomax, T.C. Sexuality of Male-to-Female Transsexuals. Arch Sex Behav 37, 586–597 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-007-9306-9
Post Author
Geoffrey W. Sutton, Professor Emeritus of Psychology at Evangel University, holds a master’s degree in counseling and a PhD in psychology from the University of Missouri-Columbia. His postdoctoral work encompassed education and supervision in forensic and neuropsychology. As a licensed psychologist, he conducted clinical and neuropsychological evaluations and provided psychotherapy for patients in various settings, including schools, hospitals, and private offices. During his tenure as a professor, Dr. Sutton taught courses on psychotherapy, assessment, and research. He has authored over one hundred publications, including books, book chapters, and articles in peer-reviewed psychology journals. His website is https://suttong.com
Comments