BLENDED and MULTIPLE DIMENSIONS of IDENTITY
We identify ourselves in many ways and our identities change over time and in different contexts. My self is my awareness of who I am as a person. Identities are social categories by which I am known such as my social roles and the groups to which I belong. Self-identity is the appropriation of various identities that I integrate within my self-concept (Sutton, 2025, October 20).
From studies of identity salience, we know that some identities persist such as our sex, gender, cultural, ethnic, and national identities whereas, other identities are situational such as an occupational or academic identity. For some, it is the combination of identity dimensions that form a core sense of self.
CITE THIS POST
Sutton, G. W. (2025, October 20). Dimensions of self-identities. Psychology Concepts and Theories. https://suttonpsychology.blogspot.com/2025/10/dimensions-of-self-identities.html
Cultural Identity and National Identity
Cultural identity extends beyond ethnicity to include language, traditions, and values, while national identity reflects attachment to one’s country and its symbols. Both dimensions are central to belonging and adaptation, particularly in multicultural or immigrant contexts (Schwartz, Unger, Zamboanga, & Szapocznik, 2010). Recent studies also show that national identity in adolescence is positively associated with self-esteem and well-being (Yang, Zhan, & Fan, 2025).
Ethnic and Racial Identity
Ethnic and racial identity refers to the significance and meaning individuals attach to their group membership. Research demonstrates that strong, positive ethnic/racial identity can buffer against the negative effects of discrimination and promote psychological well-being (Yip, 2018). Developmental models emphasize that ethnic and racial identity formation is a dynamic process that continues into young adulthood (Umaña-Taylor et al., 2014).
Gender Identity
Gender identity refers to an individual’s internal sense of self in relation to gender categories, which may or may not align with sex assigned at birth. Research highlights its centrality to psychological well-being, particularly among gender-diverse populations who face stigma and discrimination (Baams & Kaufman, 2023). Studies also emphasize the fluidity of gender identity and the importance of affirming environments in supporting healthy development (Galupo, Pulice-Farrow, & Ramirez, 2014).
Gender Identity
I am a woman. I am a man. I am nonbinary. I am a transwoman.
Pronoun resource link: https://lgbtqia.ucdavis.edu/educated/pronouns-inclusive-language
Sexual Identity
Sexual identity encompasses sexual orientation, attraction, and the integration of these experiences into a coherent self-concept. Developmental research shows that sexual identity often undergoes exploration and consolidation during adolescence and young adulthood (e.g., Stewart et al., 2019). Longitudinal studies further demonstrate that different trajectories of sexual identity development are linked to mental health outcomes among lesbian, gay, and bisexual youth (Rosario, Schrimshaw, & Hunter, 2011).
Sexual Identity
I am gay. I am straight. I am bisexual.
Religious or Spiritual Identity
Religious identity reflects one’s affiliation with and commitment to spiritual or faith traditions, often providing meaning, belonging, and moral orientation. Cross-cultural studies show that religious identity is associated with resilience and coping in the face of stress (Park, 2005). Recent comparative work has also documented how religious identity varies across countries and world regions, shaping both personal and collective well-being (Leite, Nobre, & Dias, 2023).
Religious or Spiritual Identity
I am Christian. I am Muslim. I am atheist. I am done. I am spiritual but not religious.
Political Identity
Political identity involves alignment with ideological or partisan groups, shaping attitudes, values, and intergroup relations. Social identity theory has been applied to explain how political identity structures group belonging and polarization (Huddy, 2001). More recent work highlights how political identity interacts with beliefs and conflict, influencing civic behavior and democratic engagement (Bonomi, Gennaioli, & Tabellini, 2021).
I am a Republican. I am a Democrat. I am an Independent. I am a member of the labour party.
Attractiveness as Identity
Attractiveness functions as a salient dimension of identity, shaping self-concept, social opportunities, and partner selection. Individuals often incorporate perceptions of their own physical attractiveness into their self-identity, which in turn influences confidence, dating behavior, and relationship expectations. Decades of research generally support the matching hypothesis, which suggests that people tend to seek romantic partners of similar social desirability, most often operationalized as physical attractiveness (Walster et al., 1966; Webster et al., 2024). Although individuals sometimes pursue partners they perceive as more attractive, reciprocated matches are most likely when attractiveness levels are similar, reinforcing the cultural notion of “leagues” in dating (Cheshire et al., 2014). In contemporary contexts, online dating platforms amplify the salience of attractiveness, as studies show that physical appearance outweighs nearly all other traits in predicting initial interest and swiping behavior (Witmer, 2025). Together, these findings suggest that attractiveness is not only a personal trait but also a form of social identity and capital that structures romantic opportunities and relational outcomes.
I am attractive. I am average-looking. I am out of their league.
Occupational and Academic Identity
Occupational identity refers to self-definition through work roles and career commitments, while academic identity reflects how individuals see themselves as learners and scholars. Both domains are crucial for motivation, purpose, and professional development. Research shows that multiple identities scaffold professional identity development in academia (Bentley, Peters, Haslam, & Greenaway, 2019), and that occupational identity strongly influences emotional experience and life satisfaction (Maloney, 2023).
I am a teacher. I am a nurse. I am an engineer.
I am a manager. I am a CEO. I am a supervisor.
I am a student. I am a scholar. I am a first-generation college graduate.
Relational Identity
Relational identities, such as those tied to being a parent, partner, sibling, or friend, highlight the importance of social roles in shaping self-concept. These identities are dynamic, shifting across the lifespan as relationships form, change, or dissolve. Research in developmental and social psychology emphasizes that relational roles provide structure, belonging, and meaning, while disruptions in these roles—such as divorce or bereavement—can significantly impact identity continuity and well-being (Chen et al., 2011).
I am a parent. I am a spouse. I am a friend. She's my cousin.
Class Identity
Class identity reflects how individuals understand themselves in relation to socioeconomic position, including education, occupation, and cultural capital. In the United States, class identity is often intertwined with access to resources and opportunities, shaping both self-perception and social belonging. Studies show that class-based mismatches in education, such as those experienced by first-generation college students, contribute to disparities in belonging, achievement, and persistence in higher education (Goudeau et al., 2025). This highlights how class identity is not only a marker of social position but also a lived experience that influences identity development across contexts.
They are working class. They are middle class. They are upper class.
Disability Identity
Disability identity refers to the ways individuals with disabilities integrate their embodied experiences into self-concept, often in relation to stigma, advocacy, and community belonging. Research indicates that developing a positive disability identity can foster resilience, empowerment, and collective pride, countering societal narratives of deficit or limitation (Forber-Pratt, Lyew, Mueller, & Samples, 2017). Disability identity is thus both personal and political, reflecting how individuals navigate barriers while also affirming their place within disability communities and broader society.
I am not my disability. I have a hearing impairment. I use a wheelchair.
SELF-IDENTITIES: COMMONLY OCCURRING BLENDS
Certain individuals perceive themselves as possessing a blended core identity or a combination of identities of equal significance. In some cases, external parties classify individuals according to intersectional identities, such as African American, gay Christian, or white policeman. Additionally, certain terms, such as queen and king, encapsulate both gender and status as head of state, thereby merging distinct social identities within a single word.
Race/Ethnicity and Gender
For many Americans, racial/ethnic identity and gender identity are deeply intertwined. Black women, for example, often describe experiences shaped by both racism and sexism simultaneously, a phenomenon Kimberlé Crenshaw (1989) termed intersectionality. Research shows that women of color frequently navigate stereotypes that are not simply additive but unique to their combined identities, influencing everything from workplace experiences to health outcomes (Cole, 2009).
Sexual Orientation and Religious Identity
Another common intersection is between sexual and religious identities. Many LGBTQ+ individuals raised in conservative religious traditions report tension between their sexual orientation and faith commitments. Studies highlight both conflict—such as internalized stigma—and resilience, as some individuals reconstruct affirming religious identities or join inclusive faith communities (Barnes & Meyer, 2012; Levy & Reeves, 2011).
Examples: I am a gay Christian. She is a transgender priest.
Immigrant Status, Language, and Cultural Identity
Immigrant communities often experience identity as a blend of national origin, language, and cultural heritage. For second-generation youth, this can mean balancing a strong ethnic identity at home with pressures to assimilate into mainstream U.S. culture. Research on bicultural identity shows that navigating these dual commitments can foster resilience and adaptability, though it can also create stress when cultural values clash (Schwartz et al., 2010).
Examples: She is a Native American. He is an Anglo-American. She is a Latina. Japanese Americans were mistreated. Are you naturalized?
Social Class and Educational Identity
Class identity intersects strongly with academic and occupational identities in the U.S. First-generation college students, for example, often experience a “cultural mismatch” between working-class backgrounds and middle-class academic norms (Stephens et al., 2012). This combination shapes belonging, persistence, and achievement, highlighting how socioeconomic position and educational identity are mutually reinforcing.
Disability and Gender/Sexual Identity
Disability identity often intersects with gender and sexual orientation in ways that complicate access to community and representation. Disabled women and LGBTQ+ individuals with disabilities report navigating multiple layers of stigma but also describe empowerment through disability pride movements and intersectional advocacy (Forber-Pratt et al., 2017).
Note
This page is for education and not personal advice. Consult health care providers for the most recent information and personal concerns.
Post Author
Geoffrey W. Sutton, Professor Emeritus of Psychology at Evangel University, holds a master’s degree in counseling and a PhD in psychology from the University of Missouri-Columbia. His postdoctoral work encompassed education and supervision in forensic and neuropsychology and psychopharmacology. As a licensed psychologist, he conducted clinical and neuropsychological evaluations and provided psychotherapy for patients in various settings, including schools, hospitals, and private offices. During his tenure as a professor, Dr. Sutton taught courses on psychotherapy, assessment, and research. He has authored over one hundred publications, including books, book chapters, and articles in peer-reviewed psychology journals.
References
Baams, L., & Kaufman, T. M. L. (2023). Sexual orientation and gender identity/expression in adolescent research: Two decades in review. Journal of Sex Research, 60(7), 1004–1019.
Barnes, D. M., & Meyer, I. H. (2012). Religious affiliation, internalized homophobia, and mental health in lesbians, gay men, and bisexuals. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 82(4), 505–515.
Bentley, S. V., Peters, K., Haslam, S. A., & Greenaway, K. H. (2019). Construction at work: Multiple identities scaffold professional identity development in academia. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, 628.
Bonomi, G., Gennaioli, N., & Tabellini, G. (2021). Identity, beliefs, and political conflict. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 136(4), 2371–2411.
Chen, S., Boucher, H., & Kraus, M. W. (2011). The relational self. In S. J. Schwartz, K. Luyckx, & V. L. Vignoles (Eds.), Handbook of identity theory and research (pp. 149–175). Springer Science + Business Media. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-7988-9_7
Cole, E. R. (2009). Intersectionality and research in psychology. American Psychologist, 64(3), 170–180.
Crenshaw, K. (1989). Demarginalizing the intersection of race and sex. University of Chicago Legal Forum, 1989(1), 139–167.
Forber-Pratt, A. J., Lyew, D. A., Mueller, C., & Samples, L. B. (2017). Disability identity development: A systematic review of the literature. Rehabilitation Psychology, 62(2), 132–148.
Galupo, M. P., Pulice-Farrow, L., & Ramirez, J. L. (2014). “Like a constantly flowing river”: Gender identity flexibility among nonbinary individuals. Psychology of Sexual Orientation and Gender Diversity, 1(3), 232–243.
Goudeau, S., Stephens, N. M., Markus, H. R., Darnon, C., Croizet, J.-C., & Cimpian, A. (2025). What causes social class disparities in education? Psychological Review, 132(2), 380–403.
Huddy, L. (2001). From social to political identity: A critical examination of social identity theory. Political Psychology, 22(1), 127–156.
Leite, Â., Nobre, B., & Dias, P. (2023). Religious identity, religious practice, and religious beliefs across countries and world regions. Archive for the Psychology of Religion, 45(2), 107–132.
Levy, D. L., & Reeves, P. (2011). Resolving identity conflict: Gay, lesbian, and queer individuals with a Christian upbringing. Journal of Gay & Lesbian Social Services, 23(1), 53–68.
Maloney, E. K. (2023). The influence of occupational identity on emotional experience. American Behavioral Scientist, 67(1), 100–124.
Rosario, M., Schrimshaw, E. W., & Hunter, J. (2011). Different patterns of sexual identity development over time: Implications for the mental health of lesbian, gay, and bisexual youths. Journal of Sex Research, 48(1), 3–15.
Park, C. L. (2005). Religion and meaning. Psychological Inquiry, 16(1), 1–21.
Schwartz, S. J., Unger, J. B., Zamboanga, B. L., & Szapocznik, J. (2010). Rethinking the concept of acculturation. American Psychologist, 65(4), 237–251.
Stephens, N. M., Fryberg, S. A., Markus, H. R., Johnson, C. S., & Covarrubias, R. (2012). Unseen disadvantage: How American universities’ focus on independence undermines the academic performance of first-generation college students. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 102(6), 1178–1197.
Stewart, J. L., Spivey, L. A., Widman, L., Choukas-Bradley, S., & Prinstein, M. J. (2019). Developmental patterns of sexual identity, romantic attraction, and sexual behavior among adolescents over three years. Journal of adolescence, 77, 90–97. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adolescence.2019.10.006
Taylor, L. S., Fiore, A. T., Mendelsohn, G. A., & Cheshire, C. (2011). “Out of my league”: A real-world test of the matching hypothesis. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 37(7), 942–954. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167211409947
Umaña-Taylor, A. J., et al. (2014). Ethnic and racial identity during adolescence and into young adulthood: An integrated conceptualization. Child Development, 85(1), 21–39.
Walster, E., Aronson, V., Abrahams, D., & Rottmann, L. (1966). Importance of physical attractiveness in dating behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 4(5), 508–516.
Webster, G. D., Li, Z., Park, S. Y., Mahar, E. A., Wongsomboon, V., & Rodriguez, L. M. (2024). Dyadic secondary meta-analysis: Attractiveness in mixed-sex couples. Personality and Individual Differences, 212, 112011. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2023.112011Yang, Y., Zhan, J., & Fan, Y. (2025). From national identity to well-being: The mediating role of self-esteem in adolescents. BMC Psychology, 13, 507.
Yip, T. (2018). Ethnic/racial identity—A double-edged sword? Associations with discrimination and psychological outcomes. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 27(3), 170–175.
Comments