Showing posts with label Cognition. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Cognition. Show all posts

Sunday, March 3, 2024

Consciousness in psychology

 


Consciousness is a person’s awareness of oneself and one’s context. This subjective state is studied scientifically by searching for brain activity correlated with the experience of consciousness.

Clinically, consciousness is experienced in terms of the common cognitive-behavioral triad (Affective, Behavior, Cognition or ABC) and two contexts. The internal context of physiological processes and the external context of social space and time. Briefly, consciousness includes thoughts, feelings, and action patterns contextualized by physiological processes of which we are sometimes aware and an external social space-time context such as where and when an experience occurs and who and what were prominent features in that context. These components of the psychological self are summarized elsewhere in the SCOPES model of functioning.

Consciousness is an emergent property of brains. Researchers have looked for the Neuronal Correlates of Consciousness (NCCs). The entire brain is an NCC but we do not appear to be aware of the basic processes that capture audio or visual stimuli. Brain imagery research suggests the proximal source of consciousness lies within the posterior part of the cortex called the hot zone. Electrical stimulation of cortical tissue in the hot zone elicits reports of flashing lights, shapes, distorted faces, feelings, urges, and hallucinations. The removal of parts of the posterior cortex has resulted in losses of selective consciousness such as an awareness of motion, color, or space.

Measurement

A technique called zap and zip allows neuroscientists to send a pulse of energy to the brain and measure activity using EEG sensors. The results were zipped like a computer zip file. Analysis yielded an index (perturbational complexity index) that has distinguished between consciousness in patients unable to communicate and those who were unconscious—a vegetative state.

Two Approaches to Understanding Consciousness

Global Neuronal Workspace (GNW)

GNW is associated with the work of psychologist Bernard J. Baars and neuroscientists Stanislas Dehaene and Jean-Pierre Changeaux. The idea is that when our brains process a stimulus, many of the brain’s cognitive subsystems access the information. Theoretically, a neural network in the frontal and parietal lobes is activated and the information enters consciousness. In contrast, unconscious processes occur when people carry out automatic behavior like walking while talking on their mobile phones.

 

Integrated Information Theory (IIT)

IIT was developed by Giulio Tononi and others. The focus is on the processing of whole experience scenarios analogous to a video clip. Consciousness of experience is quantified from zero as unconscious with higher numbers representing a more complex integration of information. The quantitative index is phi. The zap-zip meter estimates phi.

Status of Theories

At this point there is no acceptable theory explaining consciousness. This may be in part because of the subjectivity of the experience we call consciousness. Schurger et al. (2022) offer a critique of extant theories, which they view as descriptions of activity rather than an explanation. These authors suggest Attention Schema Theory (AST) as a possible candidate for a scientific theory. AST has been criticized as not explaining consciousness. A quote from the authors may help:

Consciousness, according to AST, is a special kind of percept that arises due to the workings of a hypothetical mechanism called an ‘attention schema’. The attention schema helps to guide, stabilize, and control selective attention, and having an attention scheme can lead to an adamant belief in an ineffable something extra that we might call qualia.

  

 

 

References

Koch, C. (2018, May 9). What is consciousness? Nature. Retrieved from https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-018-05097-x

Neuroscience News (2023, May 20). Unlocking the mind: The neuroscience behind our conscious reality. Neuroscience News. Retrieved from https://neurosciencenews.com/consciousness-neuroscience-23299/

Schurger, A. & Graziano, M. (2022). Consciousness explained or described?, Neuroscience of Consciousness, 1, niac001, https://doi.org/10.1093/nc/niac001

 Sutton, G. W. (2024, March 3). Consciousness in psychology. Psychology Concepts and Theories. Retrieved from https://suttonpsychology.blogspot.com/2024/03/consciousness-in-psychology.html




Geoffrey W. Sutton, PhD is Emeritus Professor of Psychology. He retired from a clinical practice and was credentialed in clinical neuropsychology and psychopharmacology. His website is  www.suttong.com

 

Please check out my books on   AMAZON       or  GOOGLE STORE

Follow on    FACEBOOK   Geoff W. Sutton    

   X  @Geoff.W.Sutton    


You can read many published articles at no charge:

  Academia   Geoff W Sutton     ResearchGate   Geoffrey W Sutton 

 

Dr. Sutton’s posts are for educational purposes only. See a licensed mental health provider for diagnoses, treatment, and consultation. 




 

 

Monday, January 29, 2024

Frames, Narratives, Worldviews and Psychology

 

The Protest 2023
Geoffrey W Sutton & Bing Designer

Narratives offer groups explanations for actions and often justify group behavior. 

Groups of people in conflict create narratives, which frame events for their group and those outside a group. A pervasive narrative offers a framework for understanding future information.

Persistent and pervasive narratives become substantial components of worldviews.

Lewandowsky and others provide an example of the narrative preceding the 2003 US war with Iraq and note that before the war, the narrative used a war metaphor to refer to terrorism and presented the idea of preventive war as self-defense.

Frames or narratives are not propaganda--

"Instead, frames and narratives are necessary cognitive tools, designed to pare down information in order to manage complexity. These tools facilitate communication even if they emphasize facts unevenly (Nisbet, 2009)." (Lewandowsky et al., 2013)

Effective leaders frame history for their people. They create narratives and effective narratives persist. They contribute to people's understanding of themselves and their group identity.

Frames or narratives may apply to nations, organizations, religious groups, families, and individuals.

References

Lewandowsky, S., Stritzke, W. G. K., Freund, A. M., Oberauer, K., & Krueger, J. I. (2013). Misinformation, disinformation, and violent conflict: From Iraq and the “War on Terror” to future threats to peace. American Psychologist, 68(7), 487–501.

Sutton, G. W. (2024, January 29). Frames, narratives, worldviews and psychology. Psychology Concepts and Theories. Retrieved from https://suttonpsychology.blogspot.com/2024/01/frames-narratives-worldviews-and.html


Related post

Propaganda and psychology

 


Geoffrey W. Sutton, PhD is Emeritus Professor of Psychology. He retired from a clinical practice and was credentialed in clinical neuropsychology and psychopharmacology. His website is  www.suttong.com

 

See Geoffrey Sutton’s books on   AMAZON       or  GOOGLE STORE

Follow on    FACEBOOK   Geoff W. Sutton    

   X  @Geoff.W.Sutton    


You can read many published articles at no charge:

  Academia   Geoff W Sutton     ResearchGate   Geoffrey W Sutton 

 

Dr. Sutton’s posts are for educational purposes only. See a licensed mental health provider for diagnoses, treatment, and consultation. 



Sunday, January 28, 2024

Propaganda and Psychology

Recruiting


Propaganda is a form of communication that strongly favors a particular group and attempts to influence the thinking, feelings, and actions (that is, the core functioning components of cognition, emotion/ affect, and behavior) of group members to actively support a group or a cause.

Propaganda is an effective method of shaping public opinion. The presentation of selective information can influence people's views of reality, the way they feel, and what they do. Propaganda may be used for positive and negative purposes.

Examples of groups that use propaganda include:

Political parties

Governments, especially war departments

Advertisers

Religious groups

Propaganda is not the same as spin or persuasion. 

Spin is a form of propaganda used to manage information (including facts) in a favorable way.

Persuasion is a form of communication that attempts to influence others by presenting logical arguments, evidence, and appeals to reason. Unlike propaganda, persuasion seeks to engage the audience in a rational and informed decision-making process. Persuasion relies on presenting facts, expert opinions, and logical reasoning to convince individuals to adopt a particular viewpoint or take a specific course of action.

Research sample

In an article published a few years before the horrific World War II and the powerful propaganda efforts of nations at war, Biddle (1931) identified four principles (quoted from his abstract).



Propaganda relies less upon techniques which help the individual to come into intelligent control of his conduct, and more on techniques which induce the individual to follow non-rational emotional drives. The four principles followed in propaganda are: (1) rely on emotions, never argue; (2) cast propaganda into the pattern of "we" versus an "enemy"; (3) reach groups as well as individuals; (4) hide the propagandist as much as possible.

In a 2016 study, Carriere and Blackman conducted a study of recruitment videos. One was action-oriented and the other was community oriented. They were produced by the US or ISIS. The participants rated the community oriented response highest.

References

Biddle, W. W. (1931). A psychological definition of propaganda. The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 26(3), 283–295. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0074944

Carriere, K. R., & Blackman, M. (2016). Perceptions of recruitment videos from armed forces. Peace and Conflict: Journal of Peace Psychology, 22(4), 401–403. 

Sutton, G. W. (2024, January 28). Propaganda and psychology. Psychology Concepts and Theories. Retrieved from https://suttonpsychology.blogspot.com/2024/01/propaganda-and-psychology.html



Geoffrey W. Sutton, PhD is Emeritus Professor of Psychology. He retired from a clinical practice and was credentialed in clinical neuropsychology and psychopharmacology. His website is  www.suttong.com

 

See Geoffrey Sutton’s books on   AMAZON       or  GOOGLE STORE

Follow on    FACEBOOK   Geoff W. Sutton    

   X  @Geoff.W.Sutton    


You can read many published articles at no charge:

  Academia   Geoff W Sutton     ResearchGate   Geoffrey W Sutton 

 

Dr. Sutton’s posts are for educational purposes only. See a licensed mental health provider for diagnoses, treatment, and consultation. 



Monday, January 8, 2024

Dual-Process Theory of Cognition

 

Thinking Woman 2024
by Geoffrey W. Sutton & Bing AI

The dual-process theory of cognition posits that human minds process information about the world in two ways, which are called system 1 and system 2. 

System 1 quickly processes information, which is influenced by cognitive biases and heuristics. System one thinking has been described as automatic, intuitive, and associative. System 2 is a slower system that requires cognitive effort. System 2 has been described as rational and analytical.

For an excellent review of research on system 1 and system 2 thinking, see Thinking, Fast and Slow by Daniel Kahneman.

 

Cite this post

Sutton, G. W. (2024, January 8). dual-process theory of cognition. Psychology Concepts and Theories. Retrieved from https://suttonpsychology.blogspot.com/2024/01/dual-process-theory-of-cognition.html



Geoffrey W. Sutton, PhD is Emeritus Professor of Psychology. He retired from a clinical practice and was credentialed in clinical neuropsychology and psychopharmacology. His website is  www.suttong.com

 

See Geoffrey Sutton’s books on   AMAZON       or  GOOGLE STORE

Follow on    FACEBOOK   Geoff W. Sutton    

   TWITTER  @Geoff.W.Sutton    


You can read many published articles at no charge:

  Academia   Geoff W Sutton     ResearchGate   Geoffrey W Sutton 

 

Dr. Sutton’s posts are for educational purposes only. See a licensed mental health provider for diagnoses, treatment, and consultation. 

Sunday, October 8, 2023

Nocebo effect in psychology

Image by Geoffrey Sutton with Bing AI


A nocebo effect is an expectancy effect characterized by actual negative effects based on expected negative effects of a treatment or procedure. A nocebo effect is the opposite of a placebo effect.

Examples of the Nocebo Effect

A person who focuses on the negative side-effects of a medication or vaccine may experience the expected negative effects.

A partner who believes couple therapy will fail finds the experience fails to help their relationship.


Research quote

The term nocebo (“I shall harm”) was introduced in contraposition to the term placebo (“I shall please”) by a number authors in order to distinguish the pleasing from the noxious effects of placebo (Kennedy, 1961, Kissel and Barrucand, 1964, Hahn, 1985, Hahn, 1997). If the positive psychosocial context, which is typical of the placebo effect, is reversed, the nocebo effect can be studied. Therefore, it is important to stress that the study of the nocebo effect relates to the negative psychosocial context surrounding the treatment, and its neurobiological investigation is the analysis of the effects of this negative context on the patient's brain and body. As for the placebo effect, the nocebo effect follows the administration of an inert substance, along with the suggestion that the subject will get worse. However, the term nocebo-related effect can also be used whenever symptom worsening follows negative expectations without the administration of any inert substance (Benedetti et al., 2007b, Benedetti, 2008). (Enck et al., 2008).

Reference

Enck, P., Benedetti, F. & Schedlowski, M. (2008). New insights into the placebo and nocebo responses. Neuron. 59(2). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2008.06.030



Geoffrey W. Sutton, PhD is Emeritus Professor of Psychology. He retired from a clinical practice and was credentialed in clinical neuropsychology and psychopharmacology. His website is  www.suttong.com

 

See Geoffrey Sutton’s books on   AMAZON       or  GOOGLE STORE

Follow on    FACEBOOK   Geoff W. Sutton    

   TWITTER  @Geoff.W.Sutton    


You can read many published articles at no charge:

  Academia   Geoff W Sutton     ResearchGate   Geoffrey W Sutton 

 

Dr. Sutton’s posts are for educational purposes only. See a licensed mental health provider for diagnoses, treatment, and consultation.





Novelty effect in psychology

 



The novelty effect is a psychological phenomenon characterized by attention to a new stimulus or new characteristics of a stimulus. A new event or object may garner considerable interest at first but the level of interest soon fades.

Depending on the novelty and other aspects of the stimulus, the effects may be either positive or negative. People may enjoy a new technology, game, TV show, or book. In contrast, something new can be threatening and cause considerable distress like a new disease or some new technology that doesn't work properly.




Geoffrey W. Sutton, PhD is Emeritus Professor of Psychology. He retired from a clinical practice and was credentialed in clinical neuropsychology and psychopharmacology. His website is  www.suttong.com

 

See Geoffrey Sutton’s books on   AMAZON       or  GOOGLE STORE

Follow on    FACEBOOK   Geoff W. Sutton    

   TWITTER  @Geoff.W.Sutton    


You can read many published articles at no charge:

  Academia   Geoff W Sutton     ResearchGate   Geoffrey W Sutton 

 

Dr. Sutton’s posts are for educational purposes only. See a licensed mental health provider for diagnoses, treatment, and consultation.





Numerosity adaptation effect

 

The numerosity adaptation effect is a finding that human brains quickly perceive the number of items in a visual display, which influences the perception of the number of items in later displays.

Quote


Evidence exists for a nonverbal capacity for the apprehension of number, in humans [1] (including infants [2, 3]) and in other primates [4, 5, 6]. Here, we show that perceived numerosity is susceptible to adaptation, like primary visual properties of a scene, such as color, contrast, size, and speed. (Burr & Ross, 2008)

Reference
Burr, D. & Ross, J. (2008). A visual sense of number. Current Biology, 18(6). doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2008.02.052




Geoffrey W. Sutton, PhD is Emeritus Professor of Psychology. He retired from a clinical practice and was credentialed in clinical neuropsychology and psychopharmacology. His website is  www.suttong.com

 

See Geoffrey Sutton’s books on   AMAZON       or  GOOGLE STORE

Follow on    FACEBOOK   Geoff W. Sutton    

   TWITTER  @Geoff.W.Sutton    


You can read many published articles at no charge:

  Academia   Geoff W Sutton     ResearchGate   Geoffrey W Sutton 

 

Dr. Sutton’s posts are for educational purposes only. See a licensed mental health provider for diagnoses, treatment, and consultation.





Saturday, October 7, 2023

Positivity effect in psychology

 

Good Memories 2023

The positivity effect describes a repeated finding that people recall positive information over negative information as they age. 

For a review of the theory associated with the effect, see Reed and Carstensen (2012).

Reference

Reed, A. E., & Carstensen, L. L. (2012). The theory behind the age-related positivity effect. Frontiers in Psychology, 3, Article 339. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00339

Also, see ScienceDirect for a summary of recent studies.

Positivity Effect - an overview | ScienceDirect Topics




Geoffrey W. Sutton, PhD is Emeritus Professor of Psychology. He retired from a clinical practice and was credentialed in clinical neuropsychology and psychopharmacology. His website is  www.suttong.com

 

See Geoffrey Sutton’s books on   AMAZON       or  GOOGLE STORE

Follow on    FACEBOOK   Geoff W. Sutton    

   TWITTER  @Geoff.W.Sutton    


You can read many published articles at no charge:

  Academia   Geoff W Sutton     ResearchGate   Geoffrey W Sutton 

 

Dr. Sutton’s posts are for educational purposes only. See a licensed mental health provider for diagnoses, treatment, and consultation.





Precedence effect in psychology

Audio Location 2023
Geoffrey W Sutton & Bing AI


 The precedence effect is a psychophysical phenomenon identified by Wallach and others in 1949. The effect is the perception of hearing one sound when two sounds were presented one after the other with a short delay. In such cases, the first sound is the lead sound, which determines the localization (localization dominance). The location of the second sound is suppressed (discrimination suppression).

For a  review, see Brown et al. (2015).

Reference

Brown, A. D., Stecker, G. C., & Tollin, D. J. (2015). The precedence effect in sound localization. Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology : JARO16(1), 1–28. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10162-014-0496-2




Geoffrey W. Sutton, PhD is Emeritus Professor of Psychology. He retired from a clinical practice and was credentialed in clinical neuropsychology and psychopharmacology. His website is  www.suttong.com

 

See Geoffrey Sutton’s books on   AMAZON       or  GOOGLE STORE

Follow on    FACEBOOK   Geoff W. Sutton    

   TWITTER  @Geoff.W.Sutton    


You can read many published articles at no charge:

  Academia   Geoff W Sutton     ResearchGate   Geoffrey W Sutton 

 

Dr. Sutton’s posts are for educational purposes only. See a licensed mental health provider for diagnoses, treatment, and consultation.





Primacy effect in psychology




The primacy effect is a serial position effect evidenced by better memory for items presented first in a list of items compared to the recall of items in the middle.

The better recall of the first few items is attributed to the ability to rehearse those items more than other items.

For a summary of results with different lengths of word lists and mild cognitive impairment, see Howieson et al. (2010).


Reference

Howieson, D. B., Mattek, N., Seeyle, A. M., Dodge, H. H., Wasserman, D., Zitzelberger, T., & Jeffrey, K. (2011). Serial position effects in mild cognitive impairment. Journal of clinical and experimental neuropsychology33(3), 292–299. https://doi.org/10.1080/13803395.2010.516742


Geoffrey W. Sutton, PhD is Emeritus Professor of Psychology. He retired from a clinical practice and was credentialed in clinical neuropsychology and psychopharmacology. His website is  www.suttong.com

 

See Geoffrey Sutton’s books on   AMAZON       or  GOOGLE STORE

Follow on    FACEBOOK   Geoff W. Sutton    

   TWITTER  @Geoff.W.Sutton    


You can read many published articles at no charge:

  Academia   Geoff W Sutton     ResearchGate   Geoffrey W Sutton 

 

Dr. Sutton’s posts are for educational purposes only. See a licensed mental health provider for diagnoses, treatment, and consultation.





Recency effect in psychology




 The recency effect is a serial position effect evident by a person's better recall of more recent information than recall of earlier information.

The effect is based on the work of Hermann Ebbinghaus who studied the capacity to remember lists. Items at the end of the list (the most recent items) were recalled better than those in the middle. Those items at the beginning were also recalled better than those in the middle (primacy effect).



Geoffrey W. Sutton, PhD is Emeritus Professor of Psychology. He retired from a clinical practice and was credentialed in clinical neuropsychology and psychopharmacology. His website is  www.suttong.com

 

See Geoffrey Sutton’s books on   AMAZON       or  GOOGLE STORE

Follow on    FACEBOOK   Geoff W. Sutton    

   TWITTER  @Geoff.W.Sutton    


You can read many published articles at no charge:

  Academia   Geoff W Sutton     ResearchGate   Geoffrey W Sutton 

 

Dr. Sutton’s posts are for educational purposes only. See a licensed mental health provider for diagnoses, treatment, and consultation.





Kuleshov effect in psychology



The Kuleshov effect, named for Lev Vladimirovich Kuleshov, refers to the effect of the juxtaposition of film clips on meaning.

The sequence of film shots can change what the clips mean to the viewer compared to viewing the clips by themselves.

Research quotation: 

Nearly a century ago, Soviet filmmaker Lev Kuleshov demonstrated that the manipulation of context can alter an audiences’ perception of an actor's facial expressions, thoughts and feelings. For example, juxtaposition of identical archived clips of actor Ivan Mozzhukhin's face with either a scene of a funeral or a child playing led the audience to infer Mozzhukhin's emotional disposition as subtly melancholic or happy, respectively (Kawin, 1992). Despite the somewhat anecdotal nature of Kuleshov's observations, subsequent empirical work has confirmed that appropriate contextual framing will cause an observer to perceive neutral faces as happy or sad (Wallbott, 1988), angry faces as fearful (Carroll and Russell, 1996) and screams as joyful (Goldberg, 1951). Importantly, while this phenomenon is a ubiquitous tool of filmmakers it also speaks to the highly complex way in which context influences social attributions.
  Source (Mobbs et al., 2006)

Reference

Mobbs, D., Weiskopf, N., Lau, H. C., Featherstone, E., Dolan, R. J., & Frith, C. D. (2006). The Kuleshov Effect: the influence of contextual framing on emotional attributions. Social cognitive and affective neuroscience1(2), 95–106. https://doi.org/10.1093/scan/nsl014


Geoffrey W. Sutton, PhD is Emeritus Professor of Psychology. He retired from a clinical practice and was credentialed in clinical neuropsychology and psychopharmacology. His website is  www.suttong.com

 

See Geoffrey Sutton’s books on   AMAZON       or  GOOGLE STORE

Follow on    FACEBOOK   Geoff W. Sutton    

   TWITTER  @Geoff.W.Sutton    


You can read many published articles at no charge:

  Academia   Geoff W Sutton     ResearchGate   Geoffrey W Sutton 

 

Dr. Sutton’s posts are for educational purposes only. See a licensed mental health provider for diagnoses, treatment, and consultation.