Showing posts with label psychology of religion. Show all posts
Showing posts with label psychology of religion. Show all posts

Friday, January 26, 2024

Christian Psychology as a concept

 

Christian Counseling 2024
Created by Geoffrey Sutton with Designer

Christian Psychology

Christian psychology is an approach to psychology that begins with a Christian understanding of the soul. Sizemore (2011) credited two philosophers, Stephen Evans and Robert Roberts, with the impetus for Christian psychology based on their challenge to develop a Christian psychology based on a Christian framework and not limited to the variables studied in secular psychology.

Sisemore referred to a journal as “the primary voice of the position, Edification: The Transdisciplinary Journal of the Society for Christian Psychology.”

Sisemore also referred to Eric Johnson’s work (e.g., see Johnson, 2020), including the Society for Christian Psychology (Johnson was the director when Sisemore's article was written).

Christian psychology is one of the views in Johnson's (2010)  Five Views book referenced below. The book includes a chapter on Christian psychology and perspectives on other views.

References

Johnson, E. L. (Ed). (2010). Psychology and Christianity: Five Views (2nd ed.). Downers Grove, IL: IVP Academic.

Sisemore, T. A. (2011). An introduction to the Christian psychology special issue. Journal of Psychology and Christianity, 30, (4), 271-273.

Sutton, G. W. (2024, January 26). Christian psychology. Psychology Concepts and Theories. Retrieved from https://suttonpsychology.blogspot.com/2024/01/christian-psychology-as-concept.html

Related post

Psychology defined


Geoffrey W. Sutton, PhD is Emeritus Professor of Psychology. He retired from a clinical practice and was credentialed in clinical neuropsychology and psychopharmacology. His website is  www.suttong.com

 

See Geoffrey Sutton’s books on   AMAZON       or  GOOGLE STORE

Follow on    FACEBOOK   Geoff W. Sutton    

   X  @Geoff.W.Sutton    


You can read many published articles at no charge:

  Academia   Geoff W Sutton     ResearchGate   Geoffrey W Sutton 

 

Dr. Sutton’s posts are for educational purposes only. See a licensed mental health provider for diagnoses, treatment, and consultation. 

 A related resource

Assessing Spirituality & Religiosity

On AMAZON









Sunday, September 24, 2023

Rambo's Stage Theory of Religious Conversion

Changing Churches 2023
by Geoffrey W Sutton & Bing AI


Lewis Rambo, a leading theorist associated with the study of religious conversions, has presented a seven-stage process model of change from one religion to another. The model draws upon multidisciplinary sources of evidence and ideas focused on the process of religious conversion.

The model has been used to identify the stages of conversion and deconversion. The seven stages are:



1 Context: The dynamic personal, social, and cultural environment of the person. Contexts may be large such as a nation or as small as family and friends (microcontexts).

2 Crisis: The person becomes aware of difficulties and the lack of effectiveness. A crisis event is common in stories of conversion. Rambo suggests a variety of crises such as religious, psychological, cultural, and political. Crises may be described by five variables: Intensity, Duration, Scope, Source, Old/New. Crises may also be viewed from the perspective of research on Religious Struggles.

3 Quest: Possibly in response to a crisis, the person searches for meaning and a purpose in life.

4 Encounter: The person meets a key person who connects them with the new religion.

5 Interaction: The person develops an interest in the new way of living including new beliefs, practices, and experiences.

6 Commitment: The person goes public with their new faith. For example, a Christian becomes baptised. In some faiths, the person gives their testimony. To use a Christian phrase, they have become born again.

7 Consequences: Following conversion, there are consequences for the person and the group. The consequences may be dramatic or slow and the consequences are varied. On a personal level, some converts report a powerful sense of love, relief from guilt, and even a calling.

 

 The seven stages do not indicate a rigid stepwise process but allows for variation in a person’s movement from one religion to another. 


Along with the model that describes the process of change, the theory posits five types of conversions: apostasy, intensification, affiliation, institutional transition, tradition transition.

Although the model focuses on the process of conversion, it may also be seen as a model of deconversion for those already in a religion who enter a process of changing within their religion to another group, to another religion, or even leaving religion.

Related Concepts

Big Four Religious Dimensions

Religious Deidentification

Religious Residue Effect


Reference

Rambo, L. R. (1993). Understanding religious conversion. New Haven: Yale University Press.


Geoffrey W. Sutton, PhD is Emeritus Professor of Psychology. He retired from a clinical practice and was credentialed in clinical neuropsychology and psychopharmacology. His website is  www.suttong.com

 

See Geoffrey Sutton’s books on   AMAZON       or  GOOGLE STORE

Follow on    FACEBOOK   Geoff W. Sutton    

   X  @Geoff.W.Sutton    


You can read many published articles at no charge:

  Academia   Geoff W Sutton     ResearchGate   Geoffrey W Sutton 

 

Dr. Sutton’s posts are for educational purposes only. See a licensed mental health provider for diagnoses, treatment, and consultation.

Key concepts

Psychology of Religious Conversion

Psychology of Religious Deconversion

Religious Commitment

Religious or Spiritual Quest


Saturday, September 23, 2023

Big Four Religious Dimensions Model and Psychology

 

The Big Four Religious Dimensions Model is a theoretical model of the psychological dimensions of religion proposed by Vassilis Saroglou (2011). The model illustrates four basic dimensions, which are universally true of religions across multiple cultures and distinguish religion from other social constructs.

See the paragraphs below for a summary of The Big Four Religious Dimensions. The concepts in parentheses link to the SCOPES model of psychosocial functioning.

Believing (Cognition)

The key feature of believing, a cognitive function, are beliefs in transcendence; that is, in God, gods, or spiritual forces beyond people and the natural world. This dimension sets the religious apart from atheists, the nonreligious, and the nonspiritual. This dimension is also relevant to understanding religion as a meaning-making process.

Bonding (Emotion)

The key feature of bonding is the emotional experience people find through religious practices or rituals. The experiences bond the religious to their ultimate reality. Examples of common rituals which vary across religions and cultures are prayer, meditation, worship, public ceremonies, and pilgrimages.

Behaving (Behavior Patterns)

Morality is the key feature of behaving in right or wrong ways according to one’s religion. The moral values promote social order and reciprocal altruism. Religions offer higher moral standards than found in the host culture and provide taboos that are nonnegotiable. Examples of this moral feature include the widely acclaimed virtues such as altruism, sacrifice, and humility.

Belonging (Social Context)

Religions offer people a social identity and meet a universal need to belong. They are transcultural and transhistorical thus promoting a valuable social identity and group self-esteem. People sharing the same religion celebrate a connectedness when they meet at international events. And religions connect people with an illustrious past and a hope-filled perspective on eternity.

Saroglou suggests how the combination of two dimensions may link to recognizable forms of religious communities or expressions.

Believing + Bonding = Spirituality

Believing + Behaving = Intrinsic Religion

Believing + Belonging = Orthodox religious groups

Bonding + Behaving = Asceticism

Bonding + Belonging = Charismatic communities

Behaving + Belonging = Moral communities

Related Posts

Rambo's Stage Theory of Religious Conversion

Religious Deidentification

SCOPES model of human functioning


Reference

Saroglou, V. (2011). Believing, Bonding, Behaving, and Belonging: The Big Four Religious Dimensions and Cultural Variation. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 42(8), 1320–1340. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022022111412267



Geoffrey W. Sutton, PhD is Emeritus Professor of Psychology. He retired from a clinical practice and was credentialed in clinical neuropsychology and psychopharmacology. His website is  www.suttong.com

 

See Geoffrey Sutton’s books on   AMAZON       or  GOOGLE STORE

Follow on    FACEBOOK   Geoff W. Sutton    

   TWITTER  @Geoff.W.Sutton    


You can read many published articles at no charge:

  Academia   Geoff W Sutton     ResearchGate   Geoffrey W Sutton 

 

Dr. Sutton’s posts are for educational purposes only. See a licensed mental health provider for diagnoses, treatment, and consultation.








Friday, September 22, 2023

Religious Deidentification and Psychology

Leaving church behind 2023
Geoffrey W Sutton & Bing Images


In the psychology of religion, religious deidentification refers to a change from endorsing a religious self-identity to no longer identifying as religious.

Although the concept appears similar to deconversion, it is different because the focus is on a change in self-identity rather than a focus on leaving a religious tradition.  Also, deidentification may be nuanced as people continue some aspects of a previous religious identity. The persistent features have been called religious residue. See Van Tongeren & DeWall (2021).


Reference

Van Tongeren, D. R., & DeWall, C. N. (2021). Disbelief, disengagement, discontinuance, and disaffiliation: An integrative framework for the study of religious deidentification. Psychology of Religion and Spirituality. https://doi.org/10.1037/rel0000434


Geoffrey W. Sutton, PhD is Emeritus Professor of Psychology. He retired from a clinical practice and was credentialed in clinical neuropsychology and psychopharmacology. His website is  www.suttong.com

 

See Geoffrey Sutton’s books on   AMAZON       or  GOOGLE STORE

Follow on    FACEBOOK   Geoff W. Sutton    

   TWITTER  @Geoff.W.Sutton    


You can read many published articles at no charge:

  Academia   Geoff W Sutton     ResearchGate   Geoffrey W Sutton 

 

Dr. Sutton’s posts are for educational purposes only. See a licensed mental health provider for diagnoses, treatment, and consultation.


Religious Residue Effect in Psychology

 

Religious Residue Effect 2023
Geoffrey W Sutton with Bing Images

The religious residue effect describes the finding that features of people's previous religiosity continue to be a part of a their life after they no longer identify as religious. 

These residual effects may be evident in beliefs and attitudes, bonding practices (e.g., baptisms, ceremonies), moral behavior, and interactions with religious people maintaining a sense of belonging. See Van Tongeren et al. (2021).

Van Tongeren and DeWall draw upon the work of Saroglou (e.g., Saroglou et al., 2020), who present the Big Four of religion, which refer to four components of religion. When people leave religion (deidentification), they continue to reveal their former religious identity.

The Big Four are:


Believing- what people believe about God or gods and the supernatural

Bonding- faith practices that bring people together and create emotional bonds

Behaving- the way people ought to behave-- the moral influence of religion

Belonging- the social dimension of faith that connects people to their community




References

Saroglou, V., Clobert, M., Cohen, A. B., Johnson, K. A., Ladd, K. L., Van Pachterbeke, M., Adamovova, L., Blogowska, J., Brandt, P.-Y., Çukur, C. S., Hwang, K.-K., Miglietta, A., Motti-Stefanidi, F., Munoz-García, A., ˜ Murken, S., Roussiau, N., & Tapia Valladares, J. (2020). Believing, bonding, behaving, and belonging: The cognitive, emotional, moral, and social dimensions of religiousness across cultures. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 51(7–8), 551–575. https://doi.org/10.1177/ 0022022120946488


Van Tongeren, D. R., & DeWall, C. N. (2021). Disbelief, disengagement, discontinuance, and disaffiliation: An integrative framework for the study of religious deidentification. Psychology of Religion and Spirituality. https://doi.org/10.1037/rel0000434


Van Tongeren, D. R., DeWall, C. N., Chen, Z., Sibley, C. G., & Bulbulia, J. (2021). Religious residue: Cross-Cultural evidence that religious psychology and behavior persist following deidentification. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 120(2), 484–503. https://doi.org/10.1037/ pspp0000288



Geoffrey W. Sutton, PhD is Emeritus Professor of Psychology. He retired from a clinical practice and was credentialed in clinical neuropsychology and psychopharmacology. His website is  www.suttong.com

 

See Geoffrey Sutton’s books on   AMAZON       or  GOOGLE STORE

Follow on    FACEBOOK   Geoff W. Sutton    

   TWITTER  @Geoff.W.Sutton    


You can read many published articles at no charge:

  Academia   Geoff W Sutton     ResearchGate   Geoffrey W Sutton 

 

Dr. Sutton’s posts are for educational purposes only. See a licensed mental health provider for diagnoses, treatment, and consultation.


Monday, September 4, 2023

Spiritual Bypassing and Psychotherapy



Spiritual bypassing (Welwood, 1984) refers to the use of spirituality to avoid dealing with psychological factors important to psychological wellbeing.

The phenomenon was known to psychotherapists who observed people using their religiosity or spirituality to avoid doing the hard work needed to deal with their mental health issues.

The construct was operationally defined by Fox and others (2017) in the Spiritual Bypass Scale. Two factors appear to represent the construct: One is Psychological Avoidance and the other is Spiritualizing.

Comments

A spiritual bypass is analogous to a drug that temporarily reduces distress without offering a long-lasting cure.

A spiritual bypass may be evident in sayings that distract a patient from their symptoms or getting the treatment they need. 

A few examples:

"When God closes a door, He opens a window."

"All things happen for a reason."

"God doesn't give you more than you can handle."

"God will protect you."

"I can do all things through Christ who strengthens me."

"God has you in the palm of his hand."

"I'll pray about it."

"God works in mysterious ways."

Although some find the foregoing sayings comforting, the expressions may interfere with health or mental health if they are used to avoid treatment or end treatment too soon. Thus the examples are not about a particular saying or belief, but rather cues to think about any spiritual message that is a barrier to improved functioning.

Hypothesis: Patients prone to using a spiritual bypass may benefit from faith-based counseling or pastoral counseling.


Related post

See the Spiritual Bypass Scale

    Spiritual Bypass Scale-13


Fox, J., Cashwell, C. S., & Picciotto, G. (2017). The opiate of the masses: Measuring spiritual bypass and its relationship to spirituality, religion, mindfulness, psychological distress, and personality. Spirituality in Clinical Practice, 4(4), 274-287. doi: https://dx.doi.org/10.1037/scp0000141

Sutton, G. W. (2023, September 4). Spiritual bypassing and psychotherapy. PSYCHOLOGY Concepts and Theories. Retrieved from https://suttonpsychology.blogspot.com/2023/09/spiritual-bypassing-and-psychotherapy.html

Welwood, J. (1984). Principles of inner work: Psychological and spiritual. Journal of Transpersonal Psychology, 16, 63–73.

Geoffrey W. Sutton, PhD is Emeritus Professor of Psychology. He retired from a clinical practice and was credentialed in clinical neuropsychology and psychopharmacology. His website is  www.suttong.com

 

See Geoffrey Sutton’s books on   AMAZON       or  GOOGLE STORE

Follow on    FACEBOOK   Geoff W. Sutton    

   @Geoff.W.Sutton    


You can read many published articles at no charge:

  Academia   Geoff W Sutton     ResearchGate   Geoffrey W Sutton 

 

Dr. Sutton’s posts are for educational purposes only. See a licensed mental health provider for diagnoses, treatment, and consultation.


For measures related to Spirituality and Religiosity, see 

Assessing Spirituality and Religiosity   


Available On AMAZON






Tuesday, July 25, 2023

Apathist in Psychology of Religion



In psychology of religion studies, apathists are people with low levels of religious or atheist beliefs.

References

Alsuhibani, Azzam, Shevlin, Mark, & Bentall, Richard P. (Jun 24, 2021). Atheism is not the absence of religion: Development of the monotheist and atheist belief scales and associations with death anxiety and analytic thinking. Psychology of Religion and Spirituality, 14(3), 362-370. doi: https://dx.doi.org/10.1037/rel0000425

Rauch, J. (2003). Let it be. Atlantic Monthly. https://www.theatlantic.com/ magazine/archive/2003/05/let-it-be/302726/


Geoffrey W. Sutton, PhD is Emeritus Professor of Psychology. He retired from a clinical practice and was credentialed in clinical neuropsychology and psychopharmacology. His website is  www.suttong.com

 

See Geoffrey Sutton’s books on   AMAZON       or  GOOGLE STORE

Follow on    FACEBOOK   Geoff W. Sutton    

   TWITTER  @Geoff.W.Sutton    


You can read many published articles at no charge:

  Academia   Geoff W Sutton     ResearchGate   Geoffrey W Sutton 

 

Dr. Sutton’s posts are for educational purposes only. See a licensed mental health provider for diagnoses, treatment, and consultation.

Tuesday, March 28, 2023

Devils, Demons, and Psychology

 


Devils & Demons/ Geoff Sutton Canva 2023

Belief in demons or the devil is a complex topic that has been studied from various scholarly perspectives, including psychological, sociological, and cultural. Following are a few references that might help in understanding this phenomenon.

Ancient Jewish writings in the Bible describe erratic behavior and link the phenomena to evil spirits (e.g., 1 Samuel 16.14). Jesus was known for casting out evil spirits (e.g., Luke 7-8). That tradition is known as exorcism in the Catholic church and deliverance in Protestant traditions.

In 2016, Gallup researchers found that 89% of Americans believe in God and 61% believe in a devil. An additional 12% are unsure, and 27% report that they do not believe in the existence of a devil. If we encounter a group of Americans typical of the nation, we may assume that most believe in some form of spirituality involving supernatural beings and more than half believe in an evil being (Sutton, 2021).

Nie and Olson (2016) analyzed data from the large national sample of American youth (n = 3,290) recorded in three waves 2003, 2005, and 2007-2008. They asked: “do you believe in the existence of demons or evil spirits? (p. 502)” They found a strong positive correlation (r = .39) between closeness to God and belief in demons.

Perspectives

Pargament and Mahoney (2005) present the concept of sanctification, which refers to the process of imbuing an object or experience with sacred meaning. The authors argue that belief in demons or the devil is often associated with sanctification, as individuals view these entities as powerful forces that are in opposition to God or other sacred values.

“Although objects may be perceived to be embodiments of the divine, they may also be seen as embodiments of evil or the demonic. In fact, the two processes—sanctification and demonization—may be closely interconnected, for those who commit desecrations against sacred objects may be perceived as demonic in nature.” (p. 194)


In a chapter titled Devils, Demons, and Deliverance, Sutton (2021) reviewed research on the topic especially as related to Charismatic and Pentecostal Christians. Richie (2020) advises readers that although Pentecostals believe in the devil and demons, he encourages focusing on God, and avoiding giving undue credit to demonic power, but not dismissing such evil altogether. The chapter also includes guidance from psychologist Siang-Yang Tan on identifying and meeting the needs of people troubled by demons.

Julie Exline and her colleagues recognized the struggles people experience with the demonic in the Religious and Spiritual Struggles Scale. This assessment can be a useful tool for researchers and mental health providers.


Supernatural Evil and Mental Health Studies

Christoper Lloyd and Rober Waller (2020) studied mental health in an Evangelical sample. Their results are based on a survey of 446 Evangelicals. Some results were:

Thirty-one percent of respondents reported experiencing teaching which exclusively spiritualised their mental distress. However, 94% endorsed secular interventions (psychological therapy) as effective. Additionally, 73% of respondents endorsed non-spiritual causal attributions (biological/neurological or traumatic/lived experiences) for mental distress. Overall, 56% indicated positive engagement within their faith communities.


Susan Caplan (2019) reported the results of a study of beliefs about mental health among people identified as Hispanic. Her summary: 

Results: Participants were socialized to believe that persons with mental illness were dangerous, out of control, and suffering from an incurable illness that resulted in rejection and ostracism. Most families would deny the existence of depression and mental illness, unless symptoms greatly interfered with daily functioning or were life-threatening. Religious coping such as prayer, and faith in God, were believed to be protective factors. Causal attributions for depression were both biomedical and religious, such as lack of faith, not praying, demons, and sinful behaviors of parents.

In their summary of research in Southeast Asia, Suba et al. (2022) noted that disrespect for spirits or Gods can be a cause of mental illness.  Following is a quote from their article:

In Indonesian traditional culture and society, people believe in various creatures, such as hantu, iblis, jinn, Satan, ruh, and jaelangkung or spirits. Often, Iblis (considered the leader of evil spirits) is claimed to tempt humans to commit sins (Sells, 1995; Subu, 2015). Worldwide, studies have showed that many people believe mental illnesses are “spiritual illnesses” caused by demonic or spirit possessions, witchcraft, or the effect of the evil-eye (Karanci, 2014; Ross et al., 2013; Stefanovics et al., 2016; Tajima-Pozo et al., 2011). The notion of jinn possessing humans is also widespread among Muslims and accepted by most Islamic scholars, even though it is not directly attested in the Quran (Dein & Illaiee, 2013).

*****

Labinjo and others (2020) studied mental health in Nigeria in 64 articles. A quote from the abstract is informative: 

The most common determinants of mental health disorders as perceived by Nigerians were supernatural causes such as possession of evil spirits, sorcery, witchcraft, and divine punishment. In addition, a significant number of articles attributed the cause to drug or alcohol misuse. Social distancing and avoidance were expressed in all papers that looked at attitudes towards people with mental disorders. The research showed that Nigerians held supernatural belief as the cause of mental disorders and religion is a significant cultural aspect for Nigerians.

Fiona Thomas and her research team (2016) studied local views on mental health following armed conflict in Sri Lanka. They obtained their data from focus groups and interviews. A summary finding was: "Thematic analyses showed a large range of impact on mental health conceptualized as spiritual problems (e.g., evil spirits and witchcraft), moral concerns (e.g., violence as a means to solve conflict), and perceived cultural decline."


References

Caplan, S. (2019). Intersection of cultural and religious beliefs about mental health: Latinos in the faith-based setting. Hispanic Health Care International, 17(1), 4–10. https://doi.org/10.1177/1540415319828265

Labinjo, T., Serrant, L., Ashmore, R., & Turner, J. (2020). Perceptions, attitudes and cultural understandings of mental health in Nigeria: A scoping review of published literature. Mental Health, Religion & Culture, 23(7), 606–624. https://doi.org/10.1080/13674676.2020.1726883

Lloyd, C. E. M., & Waller, R. M. (2020). Demon? Disorder? Or none of the above? A survey of the attitudes and experiences of evangelical Christians with mental distress. Mental Health, Religion & Culture, 23(8), 679–690. https://doi.org/10.1080/13674676.2019.1675148

Nie, F., & Olson, D. V. A. (2016). Demonic Influence: The negative mental health effects of belief in demons. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 55(3), 498–515. https://doi.org/10.1111/jssr.12287

 Pargament, K., & Mahoney, A. (2005). THEORY: “Sacred Matters: Sanctification as a Vital Topic for the Psychology of Religion.” The International Journal for the Psychology of Religion15(3), 179–198.

Subu, M. A., Holmes, D., Arumugam, A., Al-Yateem, N., Maria Dias, J., Rahman, S. A., Waluyo, I., Ahmed, F. R., & Abraham, M. S. (2022). Traditional, religious, and cultural perspectives on mental illness: a qualitative study on causal beliefs and treatment use. International Journal of Qualitative Studies on Health and Well-being17(1), 2123090. https://doi.org/10.1080/17482631.2022.2123090

Sutton, G. W. (2021). Counseling and psychotherapy with Pentecostal and Charismatic Christians: Culture & Research | Assessment & Practice. Springfield, MO: Sunflower.  ISBN-13 : 979-8681036524  BUY on  AMAZON

Thomas, F. C., Tol, W. A., Vallipuram, A., Sivayokan, S., Jordans, M. J. D., Reis, R., & de Jong, J. T. V. M. (2016). Emic perspectives on the impact of armed conflict on children’s mental health and psychosocial well-being: Applying a social ecological framework of resilience in northern Sri Lanka. Peace and Conflict: Journal of Peace Psychology, 22(3), 246–253. https://doi.org/10.1037/pac0000172



Geoffrey W. Sutton, PhD is Emeritus Professor of Psychology. He retired from a clinical practice and was credentialed in clinical neuropsychology and psychopharmacology. His website is  www.suttong.com

 

See Geoffrey Sutton’s books on   AMAZON       or  GOOGLE STORE

Follow on    FACEBOOK   Geoff W. Sutton    

   TWITTER  @Geoff.W.Sutton    


You can read many published articles at no charge:

  Academia   Geoff W Sutton     ResearchGate   Geoffrey W Sutton 

 

Dr. Sutton’s posts are for educational purposes only. See a licensed mental health provider for diagnoses, treatment, and consultation.

Monday, June 13, 2022

Christian Nationalism



Christian nationalism is a term for a subculture whose members identify their nation as having a Christian heritage and a God-given purpose. Members believe their nation must return to their understanding of Christian social and moral values to be blessed by God.

Christian Nationalism is a social construct commonly used in the United States, which has a large percentage of people who identify as Christians.

In the United States, Christians who present with a common set of beliefs considered to represent Christian nationalism are mostly, but not exclusively, evangelicals.

Perspectives on Christian Nationalism

Andrew Whitehead and his colleagues have written about Christian nationalism based on studies using a 6-item Christian Nationalism scale

In a 2020 interview with Paul Rosenberg of Salon, Whitehead offers the definition in the quote below.

Your book is about "Christian nationalism." Let's start with explaining what you mean by that.

When we talk about Christian nationalism, we identify it as a cultural framework that is all about trying to advocate for a fusion between Christianity, as they define it, and American civic life. This Christianity is something more than just orthodox Christian belief — it contains and overlaps with a number of other things. It operates like a signal to those that hear it, to a certain population, to say "people like us," which is generally white, native-born, culturally Christian. So it intertwines not only with narratives about the Christian heritage of the United States, but also different traditions and symbols and value systems, and really is a fusion of these identities, put together to create what they see as the "ideal" America. (Rosenberg, February 29, 2020)

**********

Davis notes features of Christian nationalism in a 2022 paper.

While Christian nationalism draws from general theories of religious nationalism (e.g. Brubaker 2011; Aho 2013), it involves several particular features. First, it is more than just civil religion, instead blending religious particularism, victimization and messianism together (Gorski 2020). Within the Christian nationalist’s worldview, there is a persistent fear of persecution, that America has not just strayed from its birthright as a Christian nation but that there are liberal forces conspiring to actively prevent government from embodying Christian values. Second, it also incorporates views about racial order and social hierarchies. Whiteness plays a role (Gorski and Perry 2022), as does gender, and its theological roots are less about morality or virtue and, instead, involve ideas about power and who should wield it.

**********

A quote from Miller who wrote an article in an evangelical magazine, Christianity Today, offers a general definition as follows.

Christian nationalism is the belief that the American nation is defined by Christianity, and that the government should take active steps to keep it that way. Popularly, Christian nationalists assert that America is and must remain a “Christian nation”—not merely as an observation about American history, but as a prescriptive program for what America must continue to be in the future. Scholars like Samuel Huntington have made a similar argument: that America is defined by its “Anglo-Protestant” past and that we will lose our identity and our freedom if we do not preserve our cultural inheritance. (Miller, 2021, February 3)

**********

I wrote about the 6-item scale elsewhere (Sutton, 2022) but I will include the items here because they offer a look at one operational definition that has been referenced in the articles or books mentioned below (Cooper-White, Davis, Rosenberg).

Christian Nationalism Scale items

The federal government should declare the United States as a Christian nation.

The federal government should advocate Christian values.

The federal government should enforce strict separation of church and state. (reverse coded)

The federal government should allow the display of religious symbols in public spaces.

The success of the United States is part of God's plan.

The federal government should allow prayer in public schools.



Cite this post

Sutton, G. W. (2022, June 13). Christian nationalism. Psychology Concepts and Theories. Retrieved from https://suttonpsychology.blogspot.com/2022/06/christian-nationalism.html


References

Cooper-White, P. (2022). The Psychology of Christian Nationalism. Minneapolis, MN: Fortress.

Davis, N. T. (2022). The psychometric properties of the Christian nationalism scale. Politics and Religion.(unpublished draft version date 05/11/2022). Retrieved from https://psyarxiv.com/sntv7/download/?format=pdf

Miller, P. D. (2021, February 3). What is Christian nationalism. Christianity Today. Retrieved from https://www.christianitytoday.com/ct/2021/february-web-only/what-is-christian-nationalism.html

Rosenberg, P. (2020, February 29). Sociologist Andrew Whitehead: How Christian nationalism drives American politics. Salon. Retrieved from https://www.salon.com/2020/02/29/sociologist-andrew-whitehead-how-christian-nationalism-drives-american-politics/

Books

The Psychology of Christian Nationalism by Pamela Cooper-White

AMAZON




Taking America Back for God by Whitehead and Perry

AMAZON




I write about psychology and religion.

Please check out my website   www.suttong.com

   and see my books on

   AMAZON       


or  GOOGLE STORE


Also, consider connecting with me on    FACEBOOK   Geoff W. Sutton    

   

TWITTER  @Geoff.W.Sutton    


You can read many published articles at no charge:

  

ResearchGate   Geoffrey W Sutton 

Academia   Geoff W Sutton