Showing posts with label personality theory. Show all posts
Showing posts with label personality theory. Show all posts

Friday, September 15, 2023

Sociocultural Assimilation Hypothesis

 According to the sociocultural assimilation hypothesis, some personality traits elicit the tendency to “swim with the sociocultural tide.” More precisely, people high on those traits should exhibit a given behavior more strongly than they would otherwise do, if that behavior is normative in their culture. By contrast, people high on those traits should exhibit the same behavior less strongly than they would otherwise, if that behavior is non-normative in their culture. Thus, according to the sociocultural assimilation hypothesis some personality traits elicit a motive to behave more normatively. According to the sociocultural contrast hypothesis, some personality traits elicit the tendency to “swim against the sociocultural tide.” More precisely, people high on those traits should exhibit a given behavior more strongly than they would otherwise do, if that behavior is non-normative in their culture. By contrast, people high on those traits should exhibit the same behavior less strongly than they would otherwise do, if that behavior is normative in their culture. Thus, according the sociocultural contrast hypothesis, certain personality traits elicit a motive to behave less normatively.

(p 1666, Entringer et al., 2020)


Geoffrey W. Sutton, PhD is Emeritus Professor of Psychology. He retired from a clinical practice and was credentialed in clinical neuropsychology and psychopharmacology. His website is  www.suttong.com

 

See Geoffrey Sutton’s books on   AMAZON       or  GOOGLE STORE

Follow on    FACEBOOK   Geoff W. Sutton    

   TWITTER  @Geoff.W.Sutton    


You can read many published articles at no charge:

  Academia   Geoff W Sutton     ResearchGate   Geoffrey W Sutton 

 

Dr. Sutton’s posts are for educational purposes only. See a licensed mental health provider for diagnoses, treatment, and consultation.


Wednesday, February 8, 2023

SCOPES Model of Human Functioning


The SCOPES model organizes information about human functioning in six domains commonly discussed in psychological research and clinical practice. The SCOPES model also helps researchers and clinicians organize tests or questionnaires that measure different dimensions of functioning.

When clinicians organize patient information using the SCOPES model, or a similar holistic model, they may be able to help patients select treatment strategies that address multiple areas related to the primary concern or diagnosis. 

For example, clinicians know that depression  may affect many areas of functioning. The SCOPES model is one way to consider the impact of depression on multiple areas of functioning such as distressing thoughts (C), feelings (E), behavior patterns (O: e.g., avoidance of engaging activities), physiological symptoms (P: e.g., appetite, sleep, sex), and Social Context (S: e.g., relationships that may help or worsen symptoms). Finally, clinicians and patients may consider core effects on the self (S) where self-esteem and self-identity may be negatively affected by depression. When applicable, treatments may include Cognitive-Behavioral Therapy, physical activity, increasing social connections, and medication.

Focusing on only one dimension of human functioning can lead to unrealistic views if we forget that each dimension of functioning interacts with the others. For example, our memories of important people from childhood are part of cognition but affect our emotions, behavior, and even our physiological reactions. Memories are part of our self-identity and may affect our spirituality too. Finally, our memories can be triggered by events in our social context like a photograph, a trip to our home town, or a movie.

                                 THE SIX COMPONENTS OF THE SCOPES MODEL


S   SELF-IDENTITY

Self-identity is a composite of several broad core features (see COPE below) that we recognize as who we are. We usually have more than one identity based on our roles in life (e.g., spouse/partner, parent, child, supervisor), personal characteristics (e.g., degree of fitness, health, intelligence, attractiveness, age), and groups (e.g., political, interest, sports fan, religious). One or a few identities stand out as highly important such as spiritual identity (see below), gender identity, or identities linked to subjectively important life roles (e.g., parent, doctor, grandparent, spouse).

We project ourselves to others through our core dimensions of expressed thoughts (cognition), feelings (emotion), observable behaviors (personality traits), and observed physical attributes. We may express our selves differently in different social contexts.

One multidimensional model that organizes several features of the self is the tetrapartite model (Cheek & Cheek, 2018). The model organizes over 40 potential aspects of identity into four categories of self-identity: personal, relational, collective, public. 

One of my research interests is in the psychology of religion and spirituality so let me give an example of  the spiritual aspect of identity. Spirituality includes religious and other ways people find meaning in life. Most organized religious faiths include a set of specific beliefs and prescribed practices but these are integrated with each person’s spiritual experience. For example, a person’s dreams and visions, and culture influence how they pray and what they identify as right and wrong. Atheists and those with nontraditional spirituality may describe meaningful experiences in the beauty of nature and music. For some, the spiritual dimension is so vital to their identity that it dominates their clothing choices, communicated beliefs, daily practices like prayer, interactions with others, music they enjoy, and what they eat or refuse to eat.

Following is an illustration of the SCOPES model where the primary self-identity is spiritual and they have a particular religious or spiritual worldview.




Examples of Test Related to the Self Domain
 
 Self-concept scales
 Self-esteem scales
 Self-efficacy scales
 Spirituality and religiosity scales
 Gender Identity scales



C   COGNITION

It doesn’t take long to form an impression of a person’s general intelligence. Sometimes we are awed and sometimes—not so much. But there’s more to cognition than solving problems on intelligence tests. We can include many neuropsychological processes such as memory, attention and concentration, language skills, and visual-spatial skills as well as cognitive biases and prejudices. 

Some aspects of cognition have a huge impact on identity such as extreme deficits in attention span, incredible ability to solve complex problems, or persistent declines in memory for self and others.

Examples of Test Related to the Cognitive Domain

  Tests of intelligence
  Tests of achievement
  Tests of language and verbal skills
  Tests of creativity
  Tests of memory
   Mental status exams

O   OBSERVABLE BEHAVIOR PATTERNS OR PERSONALITY

I used the letter O so it works with the acrostic. Essentially, people may be described in terms of a few or many durable traits like the famous Big Five listed below. 
Openness: intelligent, imaginative, insightful
Conscientious: organized, thorough, planners
Extraversion: talkative, outgoing, energetic, assertive; contrasted with introversion
Agreeable: forgiving, sympathetic, kind, affectionate
Neuroticism (v. stability) tense, moody, anxious

There are other traits or characteristics that may be added like dominance and psychopathy. People are different. We usually act in fairly predictable ways--habit patterns and traits that are part of who we are. For example, we may be known to ourselves and others as agreeable or shy.

Examples of Test Related to the Observable Behavior or Personality Domain

  Tests of personality e.g.,   Big Five,    HEXACO,    16PF

 
  Behavioral observations
  
 Tests of various traits e.g., leadership, narcissism, psychopathology

P   PHYSIOLOGY OR BIOLOGY

We all come with bodies and many of us with less than culturally desirable bodies protest that we are more than mere bodies. We want to be known for what’s "inside". Nevertheless, our physiology is a critical part of who we are. Drives for hunger, thirst, sleep, and sex vary from person to person and those biological factors vary for each of us during a day, week, or year. Measures of biological status can change and influence other aspects of who we are- height, weight, blood pressure, and more. Biology shapes our identity and we influence our biology and that of others.

We know that despite protests, people think of others in terms of a biological factors like blindness or deafness or another challenge. I am deaf in my left ear, but I did not think of myself as hearing impaired until I began to have difficulty hearing with my right ear. Now I wear a hearing aid. Some have a mental health diagnosis and are referred to by that diagnosis such as alcoholics or Schizophrenics. Some are known by a disease they have or survived such as cancer. One aspect of our entire personal identity can be a physiological status that is defining or confining. We know that we and others are more than a biological fact but somehow, we often fail to think beyond the “P” dimension. Physiology is a powerful part of self-identity.

Examples of Test Related to biopsychology

  Tests of motor functioning e.g., grip strength, finger tapping
  Tests of brain functioning e.g., MRI, EEG
  Various lab tests (e.g., blood, urine) detecting factors affecting the other domains
  Tests of stress that include biopsychological symptoms
  Questionnaires about sexual functioning
  Questionnaires about alcohol and other drugs
  Questionnaires about sleep, diet, and other health habits affecting other domains

E   EMOTIONS or feelings

Our emotions influence our identity and our judgments about others. There are many ways to show our emotions. Psychological scientists disagree on what may constitute core emotions. As a psychologist, I was tuned in to sadness, anxiety, and anger as well as joy and a sense of calm. More common emotions include fear, worry, hate, guilt, and that complex we call love. Feelings are critical to understanding who we are and why people do what they do. In some cases, our feelings can represent an important part of our identity as in I am a happy person despite times of sadness. And sometimes an "emotional identity" is less desirable.

Examples of Tests Related to the Emotional Domain

  Positive and Negative Affect Schedule (PANAS)
  Depression Anxiety Stress Scales (DASS)


S   SOCIAL -- OUR SPACE-TIME CONTEXT

The people in our lives and where we live out our day-to-day existence influences who we are even as we influence others. Our personal timeline is a factor too. We and others see common threads of who we are since childhood but we also see changes. Looking back, we may see events, people, or places that resulted in major changes in who we are today. Like many immigrants, the move from one country to another was a big deal for me and my parents. 

Our relationships matter. Relationships affect our spiritual faith, thoughts, feelings, behavior patterns and even our health. A recently divorced cantankerous fifty-year old man with a history of alcohol abuse may feel anger, distress, and worry. A 35 year-old woman may feel happy and enjoy a sense of freedom as she boards a cruise with a friend. People are different in their relationships. Some feel liberated by divorce whilst others feel devastated. Some worry about finding a mate whilst others intentionally live a single life. Some prefer frequent interaction with friends whilst others require large periods of aloneness.

The people we identify as "my people" or "my family" and places (e.g., my hometown, my country) and epochs of time (I grew up in the 50s and 60s) may also be a part of our identity.

Examples of Tests Related to the Social Domain

  Tests of relationships at home, work, places of worship, and other social settings

  Tests of organizational relationships e.g., climate, trust, etc.
  
  Tests measuring relational concepts such as forgiveness and reconciliation


SCOPES and HUMAN NATURE

The SCOPES model is a way of organizing information about ourselves and others. It is a way of recognizing we are complex beings who change in many ways. We respond to others and our environments in ways that change us. And we have an effect on others and our environment. At any given point, a few dimensions may be more important than others such as when we feel depressed at the loss of a loved one or joyful when we celebrate a birthday.

We should also be aware that activity in one or two dimensions affects the other dimensions even when we are not aware of the effects. A loud noise like a gunshot can produce fear, thoughts of safety, memories of past terror, crouching behavior, increased heart rate and even a cry for divine intervention.

Read More

I have included specific names of more tests in the research text, Creating Surveys used in universities and by individuals.

I have applied the SCOPES model to analyzing moral-social judgments in A House Divided: Sexuality, Morality, and Christian Cultures 


The SCOPES model also forms a basis for organizing research in the text:  Counseling and Psychotherapy with Pentecostal and Charismatic Christians.

The science behind the SCOPES model. 
Those familiar with psychology will recognize the common Cognitive-Affective-Behavior constructs in Cognitive-Behavioral-Therapy and attitude theory, which involved the COE dimensions. Most clinicians have coursework in the biological basis of behavior hence, the P dimension. The Social dimension includes a recognition of social contexts and time contexts, which draw upon studies in social psychology and developmental psychology-- an S dimension. Finally, the other S is for the Self, which is our way of integrating all the dimensions of ourselves into a few key identities.

Many will also recognize the importance of the environment, which I include in the Social dimension. I have also been influenced by the BASIC-ID of Arnold Lazarus—a part of his work in Multimodal Therapy and Kurt Levin’s field theory or concept of lifespace.

Cite this post (APA)

Sutton, G. W. (2022, August 24). SCOPES model of human functioning. Psychology concepts and theories. Retrieved from https://suttonpsychology.blogspot.com/2021/07/scopes-model-of-human-functioning.html

Cite this book reference for the SCOPES Model.

Sutton, G. W. (2021). Creating surveys: Second Edition| How to create and administer surveys, evaluate workshops & seminars, interpret and present results. Springfield, MO: Sunflower.   AMAZON   Paperback ISBN-13:  9798712780327     website



Test Resources



You can read about tests and survey items to measure the SCOPES dimensions in my 2017 book, Creating Surveys. Available on AMAZON    and Google














The SCOPES model was applied to understanding morality in Christian cultures in A House Divided.

Sutton, Geoffrey W. A House Divided: Sexuality, Morality, and Christian Cultures. Eugene, ORPickwick. Also available on AMAZON.














Counseling and Psychotherapy with Pentecostal and Charismatic Christians Available from Amazon and Google













Connectionwww.suttong.com

This post updated February 8, 2023

Publications referring to the SCOPES model.

Sutton, G. W. (2021). Counseling and psychotherapy with Pentecostal and Charismatic Christians: Culture & Research | Assessment & Practice. Springfield, MO: Sunflower.  ISBN-13 : 979-8681036524     

Sutton, G. W. (2017). Creating surveys: Evaluating programs and reading research. Springfield, MO: Sunflower.   AMAZON   Paperback ISBN-10: 1522012729  ISBN-13:  9781522012726     website

Sutton, G. W. (2016). A House Divided: Sexuality, morality, and Christian cultures. Eugene, OR: Pickwick. ISBN: 9781498224888

Sutton, G. W. & Mittelstadt, M. W. (2012). Loving God and loving others: Learning about love from psychological science and Pentecostal perspectives. Journal of Christianity and Psychology, 31, 157-166.  Academia Link    Research Gate Link

Sutton, G.W. & Schmidly, B. (eds.) (2016). Christian morality: An interdisciplinary framework for thinking about contemporary moral issues. Eugene, OR: Pickwick. ISBN: 9781498204767

Sutton, G.W., & Thomas, E. K. (2005). Can derailed pastors be restored? Effects of offense and age on restoration. Pastoral Psychology, 53, 583-599.

Worthington, E. L. (2020). How to Discuss Controversial Sexual Issues with Christians Who Don’t (and Do) Agree with You. Journal of Psychology and Theology, 48(3), 229–233. https://doi.org/10.1177/0091647120908017


Geoffrey W. Sutton, PhD is Emeritus Professor of Psychology. He retired from a clinical practice and was credentialed in clinical neuropsychology and psychopharmacology. His website is  www.suttong.com

 

See Geoffrey Sutton’s books on   AMAZON       or  GOOGLE STORE

Follow on    FACEBOOK   Geoff W. Sutton    

   TWITTER  @Geoff.W.Sutton    


You can read many published articles at no charge:

  Academia   Geoff W Sutton     ResearchGate   Geoffrey W Sutton 

 

Dr. Sutton’s posts are for educational purposes only. See a licensed mental health provider for diagnoses, treatment, and consultation.









Monday, October 17, 2022

Extraversion, extravert


Extraversion is a broad spectrum personality trait. People with a high degree of extraversion are considered outgoing, sociable, friendly, and highly expressive. They tend to enjoy being around other people.

Tests

Extraversion-Introversion is one of the Big Five traits measured in Big Five tests available in many languages.

Extraversion is also measured on the HEXACO scales available in many languages.

Surveys

According to over 13,000 Americans (YouGovAmerica, 2021):

32% considered themselves more extroverted than introverted

9 % identified as "completely extroverted"

Among those who identified as completely extroverted, 43% said their partner was also completely extroverted. See the survey for more details.

Research

Wilmot et al. (2019) reviewed research on the advantages of extraversion in the workplace. There were positive effects linked to 90% of the variables studied. They described the nature of the effect as a "small, persistent advantage." (p. 1447) The authors reported the advantages in four categories: motivational, emotional, interpersonal, and performance.

Personality Type

People with high levels of extraversion may be called extraverts and described as extraversive or extraverted. As a personality trait, most recognize that "pure" types do not exist. Instead, people have more or less of a particular trait.

History note

Carl Jung is credited with the early conceptualization of introversion and extroversion.

Quote from Jung (1921/1923) in Chapter X of Psychological Types.

The general-attitude types, as I have pointed out more than once, are differentiated by their particular attitude to the object. The introvert's attitude to the object is an abstracting one; at bottom, he is always facing the problem of how libido can be withdrawn from the object, as though an attempted ascendancy on. the part of the object had to be continually frustrated. The extravert, on the contrary, maintains a positive relation to the object. To such an extent does he affirm its importance that his subjective attitude is continually being orientated by, and related to the object. An fond, the object can never have sufficient value; for him, therefore, its importance must always be paramount.

Spelling

In psychology, there is a preference for extraversion for some spell the concept with an "o" thus, extroversion.

Introversion and Extraversion are one of the features in the domain of Observable Behavior in the SCOPES model of human functioning.


References

Jung, C.G. (1921/1923). Psychological Types (Translated by H. G. Baynes). New York: Harcourt, Brace.

Wilmot, M. P., Wanberg, C. R., Kammeyer-Mueller, J. D., & Ones, D. S. (2019). Extraversion advantages at work: A quantitative review and synthesis of the meta-analytic evidence. Journal of Applied Psychology, 104(12), 1447–1470. https://doi.org/10.1037/apl0000415.supp (Supplemental)

Please check out my website   www.suttong.com

   and see my books on   AMAZON       or  GOOGLE STORE

Also, consider connecting with me on    FACEBOOK   Geoff W. Sutton    

   TWITTER  @Geoff.W.Sutton    

You can read many published articles at no charge:

  Academia   Geoff W Sutton     ResearchGate   Geoffrey W Sutton 

 


Introversion, Introvert - psychology



Introversion is a broad personality trait usually considered as part of a spectrum with introversion at one end and extraversion at the other end. People with a high degree of introversion are described as quiet, reserved, and deliberate. They tend to be more sceptical of others' views and low on showing their emotions.

Testing

Extraversion-Introversion is one of the Big Five traits measured in Big Five tests available in many languages.

Surveys

According to over 13,000 Americans (YouGovAmerica, 2021):

52% considered themselves more introverted

12% identified as "completely introverted"

Research

It is commonly held that extraversion is the ideal dimension of the introversion-extraversion trait spectrum. In their study headed "Quiet Flourishing," Rodney Lawn and his colleagues (2019) that beliefs about having an "extraversion-deficit" were a factor in well-being. The authors suggested introverts may boost their authenticity and general well-being if they increased their acceptance of introversion. 

Personality Types

Some writers refer to people high on the introversion trait as introverts and they may be described as introverted or introversive. Note however, that in psychological science, personality traits are viewed as a continuum, which avoids creating the impression that people have specific personality types. That is, when measured on a test of introversion, people may score in a range from high to low.

Historic note

Carl Jung (1921) is credited with the early conceptualization of introversion and extroversion.

Spelling

Notice the spelling difference. Introversion is spelled with an "o" but extraversion is spelled with an "a."

Introversion and Extraversion are one of the features in the domain of Observable Behavior in the SCOPES model of human functioning.

See also Extraversion, extrovert.

References

Jung, C.G. (1921/1923). Psychological Types (Translated by H. G. Baynes). New York: Harcourt, Brace.


Lawn, R. B., Slemp, G. R., & Vella-Brodrick, D. A. (2019). Quiet flourishing: The authenticity and well-being of trait introverts living in the west depends on extraversion-deficit beliefs. Journal of Happiness Studies: An Interdisciplinary Forum on Subjective Well-Being, 20(7), 2055–2075. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-018-0037-5

Please check out my website   www.suttong.com

   and see my books on   AMAZON       or  GOOGLE STORE

Also, consider connecting with me on    FACEBOOK   Geoff W. Sutton    

   TWITTER  @Geoff.W.Sutton    

You can read many published articles at no charge:

  Academia   Geoff W Sutton     ResearchGate   Geoffrey W Sutton 

 


Friday, September 2, 2022

grit in psychology

 


Grit is a person's capacity to passionately persevere in the pursuit of long-term goals especially when there are detours and obstacles.

Researchers know that general intelligence is highly important to achievement but grit is highly valuable especially when dealing with complex tasks that can result in failures, reversals, and limited progress.


More recently, psychologist Angela Duckworth has been recognized as a leading expert on grit.

See Duckworth's Ted Talk for more about grit.



Features of grit

1. Identify something you are passionate about. Think back to interests and hobbies as a teen --a time before we became too busy with work and relationships to pursue our interests

2. See frustrations and difficulties as a normal part of reaching goals. How we view setbacks and mistakes can make a difference. Sometimes highly intelligent people catch on quickly and do well at school with little effort. This history of easiness can interfere with complex problem-solving if they lack grit.

3. Look for ways to make work more meaningful. Even small changes can improve grittiness.

4. Believe you can change and grow. To improve an old saying, "Old dogs can learn new tricks." My mother had an interest in art in school. In her 60s she began to paint. As the years went by, her work became considerably better.


GRIT is an acronym for Graduated and Reciprocated Initiatives in Tension reduction, which was an approach to managing conflict derived from the work of Charles E.  Osgood (1962).

Note
Grit, as a personality trait, fits in the "O" Observable Behavior dimension of the SCOPES model of human functioning.


Reference

Grit by Angela Duckworth

Duckworth, A. (2018) Grit: The power of passion and perseverance. New York: Scribner.


I write about psychology- please see my website https://suttong.com

See my books on Amazon




Friday, April 22, 2022

Arrogance

 


Arrogance is the display of behavior that observers interpret as an excessive sense of self-importance. Arrogant people may claim more knowledge or skills beyond what is evident. They disregard others' opinions unless they agree--in short, people with a high level of arrogance demonstrate considerable disrespect.

Arrogance is a trait people dislike in many cultures. As such, people high in arrogance can find themselves left out of social gatherings.

Russell E. Johnson and his colleagues reviewed the literature on arrogance and created a scale to measure it in the workplace. They suspected arrogance was related to narcissism using the WARS scale and found mixed results.

Here are quotes from their article.

"WARS scores were positively related to dominance, anger, superiority, prevention-oriented motivation, and psychological strain, and negatively related to Agreeableness and humility.We also found that arrogance did not overlap with other widespread personality-based variables (e.g., Conscientiousness)." p. 422

"...arrogance was positively related to some facets of narcissism, such as entitlement, but negatively related and unrelated to others, such as self-sufficiency and authority, respectively." p. 422

Reference

Johnson, R. E., Silverman, S. B., Shyamsunder, A., Swee, H.-Y., Rodopman, O. B., Cho, E., & Bauer, J. (2010). Acting superior but actually inferior?: Correlates and consequences of workplace arrogance. Human Performance23(5), 403–427. https://doi.org/10.1080/08959285.2010.515279

Links to Connections

Checkout My Website   www.suttong.com

  

See my Books

  AMAZON      

 

  GOOGLE STORE

 

FOLLOW me on

   FACEBOOK   Geoff W. Sutton  

  

   TWITTER  @Geoff.W.Sutton

 

   PINTEREST  www.pinterest.com/GeoffWSutton

 

Read published articles:

 

  Academia   Geoff W Sutton   

 

  ResearchGate   Geoffrey W Sutton 


Saturday, December 12, 2020

Psychology of Contempt

 


Contempt is an emotion and a disposition. Contempt destroys relationships.

Contempt is an emotion associated with feeling morally superior to another person. Contempt may be accompanied by mild anger. The people expressing contempt appears to see themselves as more powerful and of a higher status than the target of contempt.

Contempt may be upward and downward. That is, a person of lower social rank may feel upward contempt toward social superiors like authority figures or work supervisors. And people of higher social rank may feel downward contempt toward those viewed as of lower social rank like a professor toward a person of limited education or an experienced clinician toward a novice.

The work of Paul Ekman identified a facial expression of contempt as the corner of one side of a lip raised—a unilateral facial expression. The voice tone of contempt is perceived as smug and disapproving.

Contempt can have posture too—a move toward being physically upright as if to “look down one’s nose.” Eye-rolling is another sign of contempt.

As a psychotherapist, the work of John Gottman and his colleagues (e.g., Gottman & Silver, 1999) had a powerful effect on my appreciation for contempt, which is an emotion-driven attitude that can destroy a marriage.

Gottman and Silver illustrate contempt in a couple’s relationship. One partner routinely criticizes the other. The second person responds with a sneer and sarcasm when the critic makes a suggestion. The sarcasm turns to cynicism—both words reveal contempt. The authors add other indicators of contempt: “name-calling, eye-rolling, mockery, and hostile humor (Kindle location 1254).”

Contempt is related to disgust psychology but it is not the same. In both cases, a social distance occurs but disgust may be linked to feeling revulsion about something considered unclean, yucky, or sickening whereas, people feeling contempt may feel good. 

Contempt in a relationship conveys disgust and leads to more conflict, which prevents reconciliation. Contempt develops from a long history of negative thoughts toward the other in a relationship and can lead to a closely related pattern of belligerence, which is an expression of anger in an aggressive manner. Belligerence is manifest as a threat or provocation. In common language, contempt is the poison in toxic relationships.

In their article about dispositional contempt, Roberta Shriber at UC-Davis and her colleagues refer to the concept as “the tendency to look down on, distance, and derogate others who violate our standards (2017, p. 280).” These authors want to move the study of contempt from a look at the emotional components of which disgust is paramount, to a personality trait. Features of the disposition include a pattern of viewing select others as incompetent, inferior, and to be avoided. Shriber and others build on the data for contempt as a disposition based on its durability in the work of John Gottman and his colleagues.

In Christianity, the Apostle Paul warned people in the Roman church against a contemptuous attitude toward people who held different convictions (See chapter 14).

In philosophy, contempt may be discussed as an example of a judgmental emotion. See the entry "emotion" in the SEP.


For a measure of contempt, see the Dispositional Contempt Scale

Read more about the problem of contempt in relationships: Principles of Healthy Marriages

Resources

The Seven Principles for Making Marriage Work by Gottman & Silver

Unmasking the Face by Ekman & Friesen

The Righteous Mind by Haidt

Topics: #contempt #disgust #moralpsychology #righteousmind

  Links to Connections

Checkout My Page    www.suttong.com

  

My Books  AMAZON          and             GOOGLE STORE

 

FOLLOW me on   FACEBOOK   Geoff W. Sutton   TWITTER  @Geoff.W.Sutton

 

PINTEREST  www.pinterest.com/GeoffWSutton

 

Articles: Academia   Geoff W Sutton   ResearchGate   Geoffrey W Sutton 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

References

Gottman, J. & Silver, N. (1999). The seven principles for making marriage work. New York: Three Rivers.

Schriber, R. A., Chung, J. M., Sorensen, K. S., & Robins, R. W. (2017). Dispositional contempt: A first look at the contemptuous person. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 113, 280-309.