Showing posts with label Positive coping. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Positive coping. Show all posts

Monday, January 9, 2023

Anticipation as a Psychological Defense

 


Anticipation is a generally adaptive strategy for dealing with expected distress or conflict in the future by planning their reaction. Anticipation can help people prepare for debates, marriage, job interviews, travel, and sports events.

Anticipation is a Level 7 Defense Mechanism.

Resources

A- Z List of Defense Mechanisms with descriptions

 

Psychotic Defense Mechanisms described

 

Defense Mechanisms Rating Scales

            Form Self-Report 30

            Q-Sort Version

 

Geoffrey W. Sutton, PhD is Emeritus Professor of Psychology. He retired from a clinical practice and was credentialed in clinical neuropsychology and psychopharmacology. His website is  www.suttong.com

 

See Geoffrey Sutton’s books on   AMAZON       or  GOOGLE STORE

Follow on    FACEBOOK   Geoff W. Sutton    

   TWITTER  @Geoff.W.Sutton    

You can read many published articles at no charge:

  Academia   Geoff W Sutton     ResearchGate   Geoffrey W Sutton 

Dr. Sutton’s posts are for educational purposes only. See a licensed mental health provider for diagnoses, treatment, and consultation.

Affiliation in Psychology

 

Affiliation is a generally adaptive defensive strategy of finding support from others to cope with distress. The strategy may include expressing concerns and confiding in others but not entail abusing others. People may find supportive persons in clubs, organizations, and religious meetings.

Affiliation is a Level 7 Defense Mechanism


Resources

A- Z List of Defense Mechanisms with descriptions

 

Psychotic Defense Mechanisms described

 

Defense Mechanisms Rating Scales

            Form Self-Report 30

            Q-Sort Version

 Geoffrey W. Sutton, PhD is Emeritus Professor of Psychology. He retired from a clinical practice and was credentialed in clinical neuropsychology and psychopharmacology. His website is  www.suttong.com

 

See Geoffrey Sutton’s books on   AMAZON       or  GOOGLE STORE

Follow on    FACEBOOK   Geoff W. Sutton    

   TWITTER  @Geoff.W.Sutton    

Dr. Sutton’s posts are for educational purposes only. See a licensed mental health provider for diagnoses, treatment, and consultation.

You can read many published articles at no charge:

  Academia   Geoff W Sutton     ResearchGate   Geoffrey W Sutton 

Dr. Sutton’s posts are for educational purposes only. See a licensed mental health provider for diagnoses, treatment, and consultation.


Altruism in Psychology

 


Altruism is a generally adaptive strategy for meeting one’s own needs by fulfilling the needs of others. Some altruistic acts may help a person cope with past experiences when they needed help, which was not available.

Altruism is a Level 7 Defense Mechanism.

Resources

A- Z List of Defense Mechanisms with descriptions

 

Psychotic Defense Mechanisms described

 

Defense Mechanisms Rating Scales

            Form Self-Report 30

            Q-Sort Version

 


Geoffrey W. Sutton, PhD is Emeritus Professor of Psychology. He retired from a clinical practice and was credentialed in clinical neuropsychology and psychopharmacology. His website is  www.suttong.com

 

See Geoffrey Sutton’s books on   AMAZON       or  GOOGLE STORE

Follow on    FACEBOOK   Geoff W. Sutton    

   TWITTER  @Geoff.W.Sutton    

You can read many published articles at no charge:

  Academia   Geoff W Sutton     ResearchGate   Geoffrey W Sutton 

Dr. Sutton’s posts are for educational purposes only. See a licensed mental health provider for diagnoses, treatment, and consultation.

LEVELS AND CATEGORIES OF DEFENSE MECHANISMS

Public domain Image of steps/ Bing search

In this post:

 Three categories of defense mechanisms

Seven levels of defense mechanisms in a hierarchy

Psychotic defense mechanisms

Links to measures and additional information

References

By Geoffrey W. Sutton, PhD, 2023

Clinicians and researchers have organized the defenses in various ways. One long established organization is a seven-part hierarchy from a High adaptive level of defenses at the top and the lowest level called the Action Defense Level. See the work of Vaillant (e.g., 1971, 2011) to understand the properties of defense mechanisms and the seven level hierarchy.

Clinicians and researchers measure defense mechanisms using The Defense Mechanisms Rating Scales (see Perry, 1990 and Perry & Bond, 2012). These seven levels were organized into three levels of maturity reflecting levels of adaptiveness (see for example Di Giuseppe & Perry, 2021).

Below is a description of the seven levels followed by a listing of the defenses by hierarchical level and within categories (Di Giuseppe & Perry, 2021). Below the seven levels is a group of six psychotic defenses presented by Berney and others (2014) who created the Psychotic-DMRS.

 

SEVEN LEVELS

The seven levels represent a hierarchy of ways people respond to internal or external stressors.

  Level 7. High-adaptive Defense Level

This level represents positive coping with stress. There is a realistic and undistorted appraisal of the stressor and one’s ability to cope. The stressed person may turn to others or other resources for help.

  Level 6:  Obsessional Defense Level

In this level, people are aware of undesirable and stressful feelings associated with an idea or cognition. They respond in ways to maintain psychological distance from uncomfortable feelings but remain aware of the thought or idea.

  Level 5: Neurotic Defensive Level

At the neurotic level, people are somewhat aware of an unacceptable desire, motive, or thought. They experience uncomfortable feelings but use a variety of ways to block or avoid dealing with the distressing cognition.

  Level 4: Minor Image-Distorting Defense Level

Minor image-distorting defenses protect one’s self-esteem by limited but ineffective reframing of experiences of feeling weak, shames, or powerless in the face of failure, harsh comments, and negative feedback.

  Level 3: Disavowal Defenses/ Autistic Fantasy Level

In disavowal, a person does not accept or “own” a stressful problem. They may wrongly attribute the problem to someone else when they actually had some part in the problem. Effective coping is blocked by not accepting an appropriate level of responsibility that might lead to a successful resolution.

  Level 2: Major Image-distorting Defense Level

When faced with a severe threat, people may oversimplify themselves or the experience into distinct all or nothing categories(for example all good or evil, powerful or powerless). The distortion of reality may temporarily protect oneself against severe threats of abuse or punishment. The reactions may provoke the avoidance or aggression of others.

  Level 1: Action Defense Level

When faced with a threat, defense mechanisms at Level 1 include behavioral reactions commonly referred to as “acting out” or withdrawal responses.

 

MATURE DEFENSIVE CATEGORY

  Level 7. High-adaptive Defense Level

Affiliation

Altruism

Anticipation

Humor

Self-assertion

Self-observation

Sublimation

Suppression

 

NEUROTIC DEFENSIVE CATEGORY

  Level 6:  Obsessional Defense Level

Isolation of affects

Intellectualization

Undoing

 

  Level 5: Neurotic Defensive Level

    Hysterical

Repression

Dissociation

    Other Neurotic

Reaction Formation

Displacement

 

IMMATURE DEFENSIVE CATEGORY

    Immature Nondepressive

  Level 4: Minor Image-Distorting Defense Level

Idealization of self-image

Idealization of other’s image

Devaluation of self-image

Devaluation of other’s images

Omnipotence

  Level 3: Disavowal Defense Level

Denial

Rationalization

Projection

Autistic Fantasy

 

    Immature Depressive

  Level 2: Major Image-distorting Defense Level

Splitting of self-image

Splitting of other’s image

Projective identification

  Level 1: Action Defense Level

Passive Aggression

Help-rejecting complaining

Acting out

__________________________

Level 0: Psychotic Defense Level

Psychotic Denial

Autistic Withdrawal

Distortion

Delusional Projection

Fragmentation

Concretization


Resources

A- Z List of Defense Mechanisms with descriptions


Psychotic Defense Mechanisms described


Defense Mechanisms Rating Scales

            Form Self-Report 30

            Q-Sort Version


Select References

Berney, S., Roten, Y., Beretta, V., Kramer, U., & Despland, J. (2014). Identifying psychotic defenses in a clinical interview. Journal of Clinical Psychology70(5), 428–439. https://doi.org/10.1002/jclp.22087

Clark, A. J. (1998). Defense mechanisms in the counseling process in groups. SAGE Publications, Inc., https://dx.doi.org/10.4135/9781452204901

Cramer, P. (2002). The study of defense mechanisms: Gender implications. In The psychodynamics of gender and gender role. (pp. 81–127). American Psychological Association. https://doi.org/10.1037/10450-003

Cooper, S. H. (1992). The empirical study of defensive processes: A review. In Interface of psychoanalysis and psychology. (pp. 327–346). American Psychological Association. https://doi.org/10.1037/10118-014

Di Giuseppe, M., & Perry, J. C. (2021). The Hierarchy of Defense Mechanisms: Assessing Defensive Functioning With the Defense Mechanisms Rating Scales Q-Sort. Frontiers in psychology12, 718440. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.718440

 

Di Giuseppe, M., Perry, J. C., Lucchesi, M., Michelini, M., Vitiello, S., Piantanida, A., Fabiani, M., Maffei, S., & Conversano, C. (2020). Preliminary validity and reliability of the novel self-report based on the Defense Mechanisms Rating Scales (DMRS-SR-30). Frontiers in Psychiatry, 11, 870. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2020.00870

 

Di Giuseppe, M., Perry, J. C., Petraglia, J., Janzen, J., & Lingiardi, V.(2014). Development of a Q-Sort version of the Defense Mechanism Rating Scales (DMRS-Q) for clinical use. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 70(5), 452–465. https://doi.org/10.1002/jclp.22089

 

Perry, J. C. (1990). The Defense Mechanisms Rating Scales Manual (5th ed.). Boston: The Cambridge Hospital.

Perry, J. C., & Bond, M. (2012). Change in defense mechanisms during long-term dynamic psychotherapy and five-year outcome. American Journal of Psychiatry, 169, 916–925.

Prout, T. A., Di Giuseppe, M.,  Zilcha-Mano, S.,  Perry, J. C. & Ciro C. (2022) Psychometric Properties of the Defense Mechanisms Rating Scales-Self-Report-30 (DMRS-SR-30): Internal Consistency, Validity and Factor Structure, Journal of Personality Assessment, 104, 6, 833-843, DOI: 10.1080/00223891.2021.2019053

Vaillant, G. E. (2000). Defense mechanisms. In Encyclopedia of psychology, Vol. 2. (pp. 454–457). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1037/10517-166

Vaillant, G. E. (1971). Theoretical hierarchy of adaptive ego mechanisms. Archives of General Psychiatry, 24, 107–118.

Vaillant,G. E. (2011). Involuntary coping mechanisms: A psychodynamic perspective. Dialogues in Clinical Neuroscience, 13, 366–370.

 Geoffrey W. Sutton, PhD is Emeritus Professor of Psychology. He retired from a clinical practice and was credentialed in clinical neuropsychology and psychopharmacology. His website is  www.suttong.com

 See Geoffrey Sutton’s books on   AMAZON       or  GOOGLE STORE

Follow on    FACEBOOK   Geoff W. Sutton    

   TWITTER  @Geoff.W.Sutton    

You can read many published articles at no charge:

  Academia   Geoff W Sutton     ResearchGate   Geoffrey W Sutton 

 

Dr. Sutton’s posts are for educational purposes only. See a licensed mental health provider for diagnoses, treatment, and consultation.




Psychology of Defense Mechanisms

 


Introduction to the Psychology of Defense Mechanisms

A - Z List of Defense Mechanisms


By Geoffrey W. Sutton, PhD 2023

The concept of psychological defense mechanisms was developed in the writings of Sigmund Freud and Anna Freud. The idea of a defense mechanism is that people protect themselves from distressing levels of anxiety or conflicts by responding with a pattern of cognitions, emotions, or behavior. The response pattern is often with limited awareness.

In Freudian psychoanalysis, the ego unconsciously defends itself against anxiety and the attendant psychic conflict. Defenses have appeared by different names and clear descriptions varied in early writings. Sigmund Freud referred to many defenses in his works. Later, Anna Freud offered clarifications in her 1936 work, The Ego and the Mechanisms of Defense (Clark, 1998). The defense mechanisms represent levels of developmental maturity determined by the degree of distorting reality.

In current thinking, we may think of these defense mechanisms as ways people mentally cope with stressful experiences. Positive coping refers to ways that are healthy, which means the person experiences some degree of success in managing or adapting to a problem situation. Negative coping refers to strategies that do more harm than good. Some defenses, negative coping strategies, are so dysfunctional that a person may have severe difficulties functioning in one or more aspects of their life. Defensive responses can change how people perceive themselves (the self as subject), another person or organization (object), a cognition (thought, idea), or an emotion (Vaillant, 2000).

In some forms of psychotherapy, clinicians identify their patients’ defenses, determine how well they are functioning, and make decisions on the best way to help their patients deal with the attendant anxieties or conflicts.

The study of defense mechanisms can be challenging because in more than a century of writing, different terms are used for these constructs and there are variations in the features (characteristics, properties) of a particular defense mechanism. In recent decades, researchers in psychology and psychiatry have focused on clarifying recognizable features of a limited set of defense mechanisms.

In this post, I present one list. Readers may find other lists elsewhere. One way to be more definitive is to focus on identifying defenses that have some degree of empirical support as derived from operational definitions found in recent measures like the  Defense Mechanisms Rating Scales-SR-30  (e.g., Di Giuseppe et al., 2020) and a  Q-Sort technique  (Di Giuseppe et al., 2014).

The information in this post and blog is for educational purposes only. Readers interested in diagnoses and treatment recommendations should consult a licensed mental healthcare provider.

 

An A – Z List of

Psychological Defense Mechanisms


Follow the links to learn more details about these defense mechanisms.

 

Acting out

Acting out refers to a socially unacceptable or even harmful behavioral reaction to distress rather than a more peaceful processing of the painful thoughts and feelings associated with an event like divorce, natural disaster, or an accident.

Affiliation

Affiliation is a generally adaptive defensive strategy of finding support from others to cope with distress.

 

Altruism

Altruism is a generally adaptive strategy for meeting one’s own needs by fulfilling the needs of others.

Anticipation

Anticipation is a generally adaptive strategy for dealing with expected distress or conflict in the future by planning their reaction.

 

Avoidance

Avoidance is a strategy to protect oneself from real or perceived painful experiences associated with particular people or places.

 

Conversion

Conversion is a defense against dealing with distress, which results in impaired physical functioning or physical symptoms that are not explained by known biological causes.

Compartmentalization

Compartmentalization is a strategy to segment our lives in order to limit the distressing effects in one area of life.

Compensation

Compensation is a strategy of dealing with negative feelings of inadequacy by investing energy elsewhere.

 

Denial

Denial is the refusal to accept the facts about a highly distressing event.

Devaluation

Devaluation is an excessively negative appraisal of oneself or another person when faced with stressors or conflicts.

 

Displacement

Transferring a perceived conflict with one source to a different source.

Dissociation

Dissociation is an extreme distancing of oneself from a troubling context.

 

Distraction

Distraction is a strategy of avoiding distress by engaging in other activities such as shopping, talking with friends, or scrolling on social media sights.

 

Fantasy (Autistic or Schizoid)

Fantasy is the excessive and unproductive use of daydreaming to deal with stressors and conflicts instead of attempting to solve a problem, take constructive action to deal with a conflict or source of distress, or interacting with others to deal with conflicts or distress.

Help-rejecting complaining

Help-rejecting complaining is a term that replaces an older term known as hypochondriasis.

 

Humor

Humor can be an adaptive defense against distress.

Idealization

Idealization is the process of coping with stressors or conflicts by attributing exaggerated positive qualities to oneself or someone else.

 

Identification

Identification is the process of taking upon oneself the attributes of another person based on an association fantasy.

 

Intellectualization

Intellectualization is a cognitive defense strategy of avoiding distressing feelings by analyzing events as if there were no emotions involved.

Introjection

Introjection is a way of dealing with conflicts and stressors by accepting the messages of others as true of oneself. In the language of defense mechanisms, these messages are introjects.

 

Isolation of Affects

Isolation of Affects is a defense against distressful emotions by attending only to the cognitive aspects of a distressing experience.

 

Omnipotence

Omnipotence defends against stressors and conflicts by acting superior to others in terms of power, status, or ability.

 

Passive aggression

Passive-aggressive strategies appear to help people avoid the perceived effect of an outright conflict that might ensue if they were to be blunt or forthright in expressing their hostility or true feelings.

 

 

Projection

Attributing a negative quality about oneself to someone else. A person who is unhappy with their appearance is highly critical of the appearance of others.

Projective Identification

Projective Identification misattributes unacceptable feelings or impulses to someone else. People who deploy projective identification confuse their actual role as causal agent of the projected content.

 

Rationalization

Rationalization is the use of reasoning to justify behavior considered unacceptable according to one’s personal moral code or the norms of their group

 

Reaction Formation

Reaction Formation is a strategy of replacing a response to anxiety producing thoughts and feelings with their opposite.

 

 

Repression

Repression is an unconscious blocking of distressing memories from awareness.

 

Regression

Regression is a strategy of dealing with a distressful experience by reacting similarly to the way they responded during childhood.

Self-assertion

Self-assertion is a generally adaptive strategy of expressing emotional conflicts rather than keeping quiet.

 

Self-observation

Self-observation is a generally adaptive strategy for managing internal conflicts or coping with external sources of distress by assessing the effectiveness of their behaviour and making modifications to better adapt to a situation.

 

Splitting

Splitting refers to splitting one’s self-image or that of others into all good or all bad images, which avoid a realistic appraisal of positive and negative images

 

 

Sublimation

Sublimation is a generally adaptive strategy of managing potentially harmful urges into safe and acceptable activities.

 

Suppression

Suppression is an active process of avoiding distressful memories, thoughts, and feelings. Suppression is a generally adaptive strategy of regulating one’s thoughts and feelings

 

Undoing

Undoing is a strategy of performing some act to take care of one feelings of guilt.

 

 Resources

Defense Mechanisms Rating Scales

            Form Self-Report 30

            Q-Sort

 

REFERENCE BOOKS

Clark, A. J. (1998). Defense mechanisms in the counseling process in groups. SAGE Publications, Inc., https://dx.doi.org/10.4135/9781452204901       AMAZON

Cramer, P. (2006). Protecting the self. Guilford.  AMAZON

Freud, A. (1992). The ego and the mechanisms of defence. Routledge.  AMAZON


Select References

Cramer, P. (2002). The study of defense mechanisms: Gender implications. In The psychodynamics of gender and gender role. (pp. 81–127). American Psychological Association. https://doi.org/10.1037/10450-003

Cooper, S. H. (1992). The empirical study of defensive processes: A review. In Interface of psychoanalysis and psychology. (pp. 327–346). American Psychological Association. https://doi.org/10.1037/10118-014

Di Giuseppe, M., Perry, J. C., Lucchesi, M., Michelini, M., Vitiello, S., Piantanida, A., Fabiani, M., Maffei, S., & Conversano, C. (2020). Preliminary validity and reliability of the novel self-report based on the Defense Mechanisms Rating Scales (DMRS-SR-30). Frontiers in Psychiatry, 11, 870. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2020.00870

 

Di Giuseppe, M., Perry, J. C., Petraglia, J., Janzen, J., & Lingiardi, V.(2014). Development of a Q-Sort version of the Defense Mechanism Rating Scales (DMRS-Q) for clinical use. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 70(5), 452–465. https://doi.org/10.1002/jclp.22089

 

Vaillant, G. E. (2000). Defense mechanisms. In Encyclopedia of psychology, Vol. 2. (pp. 454–457). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1037/10517-166

Vaillant,G. E. (2011). Involuntary coping mechanisms: A psychodynamic perspective. Dialogues in Clinical Neuroscience, 13, 366–370.

 

Geoffrey W. Sutton, PhD is Emeritus Professor of Psychology. He retired from a clinical practice and was credentialed in clinical neuropsychology and psychopharmacology. His website is  www.suttong.com

 

See Geoffrey Sutton’s books on   AMAZON       or  GOOGLE STORE

Follow on    FACEBOOK   Geoff W. Sutton    

   TWITTER  @Geoff.W.Sutton    

You can read many published articles at no charge:

  Academia   Geoff W Sutton     ResearchGate   Geoffrey W Sutton 

 Dr. Sutton’s posts are for educational purposes only. See a licensed mental health provider for diagnoses, treatment, and consultation.