Thursday, December 10, 2020

Confirmation bias in psychology

 

Searching for Treasure 2023
Geoffrey W. Sutton & Bing AI

Confirmation bias occurs when people look at an event or set of data and find evidence to support their beliefs while ignoring contradictory evidence.

Wason (1960) reported evidence that once research participants hypothesized a rule producing a number sequence, they did not consider alternatives.

Mynatt et al. (1977) reported evidence for a strong confirmation bias in hypothesis testing.

For a review of research, see Nickerson (1998). Nickerson traces the history of confirmation bias to the philosopher, Francis Bacon. Some notes from Nickerson follow.

We have a tendency to prefer evidence that supports our beliefs, which is known as my-side bias.

The bias to search for confirming evidence occurs even when people do not have a strong interest in the search.

Confirmation bias explains why general comments from mind-readers and predictions by psychics and astrologers appear true for those who ignore inaccurate descriptions or predictions or do not consider the probability that something would be true or come to pass regardless of the prediction. 

Examples of confirmed expectations in research include ethnic, clinical, educational, socioeconomic, lifestyle, and stereotypes (p. 182).

Confirmation bias can worsen depression and paranoia.

Perceiving that a correlation between two events exists is another example of confirmation bias and is called an illusory correlation.

Confirmation bias may occur when people overestimate the ability to predict behavior based on a personality trait. Similarly, people may generalize from a person's action to think they always behave in a certain way (e.g., always angry, always kind), which is the illusion of consistency.

When people learn of a taxonomy, they tend to see other matters from that perspective. This phenomenon is called reification.

The primacy effect may help explain confirmation bias. That is, early information carries more weight in forming opinions. The primacy effect is related to the belief persistence phenomenon, which is the finding that once beliefs are formed, they are difficult to change regardless of contradictory evidence.

Our desire to favor select beliefs and ideas is an example of the Pollyanna Principle (Matlin & Stang, 1978).

There is evidence to suggest a positivity bias. That is, people find mentally easier to deal with positive findings than evaluate negative information.

More examples of confirmation bias

The historic hunt for evidence that people were witches, which resulted in the death of thousands.

Government and organizations create policies then search for evidence justifying the policies.

The history of medicine illustrates confirmation bias in diagnoses and the search for cures.

Jurors develop a bias toward a verdict before a trial is concluded. Final verdicts tend to be the same as the tentative verdicts.


References

Mynatt, C. R., Doherty, M. E., & Tweney, R. D. (1977). Confirmation bias in a simulated research environment: An experimental study of scientific inference. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 29(1), 85–95. https://doi.org/10.1080/00335557743000053

Nickerson, R. S. (1998). Confirmation bias: A ubiquitous phenomenon in many guises. Review of General Psychology, 2(2), 175–220. https://doi.org/10.1037/1089-2680.2.2.175

Wason, P. C. (1960). On the failure to eliminate hypotheses in a conceptual task. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 12, 129-140.



Geoffrey W. Sutton, PhD is Emeritus Professor of Psychology. He retired from a clinical practice and was credentialed in clinical neuropsychology and psychopharmacology. His website is  www.suttong.com

 

See Geoffrey Sutton’s books on   AMAZON       or  GOOGLE STORE

Follow on    FACEBOOK   Geoff W. Sutton    

   TWITTER  @Geoff.W.Sutton    


You can read many published articles at no charge:

  Academia   Geoff W Sutton     ResearchGate   Geoffrey W Sutton 

 

Dr. Sutton’s posts are for educational purposes only. See a licensed mental health provider for diagnoses, treatment, and consultation.





Classism as Prejudice


Photo from wiki.ubc.ca

Classism refers to prejudicial attitudes toward people based on their social class. Classism can lead to discrimination based on locally defined social class.

Researchers divide social classes in various ways. The classifications people use may include different attributes such as economic, cultural, and social capital / social influence.

Thinking of people in terms of class is a common experience. People seem to naturally classify people as rich, important, attractive, and intelligent, which has the effect of setting up contrasting categories as less than the valued class.

Some writers use a variation of a traditional five-part system:

Upper class or elite

Upper middle class

Lower middle class

Working class

Poor

A UK study classified people in the following classes (O'Brien, 2013)

Precariat- most deprived of economic, cultural, social capital

Traditional working class

Emergent Service Workers

Technical Middle Class

New Affluent Workers

Established Middle Class

Elite


Sunday, November 29, 2020

Misinformation effect

The misinformation effect is a change in the accuracy of memory of events caused by information provided to people after the event.

The type of memory affected is called episodic memory. 

Elizabeth Loftus is a leading memory researcher whose studies influence what we know about the permanence and reliability of memory.

A classic experimental model involves presenting an event to participants followed by a specific time period. Then the participants are tested for their memory of the original event. 

In other studies, researchers planted false memories, which many participants recalled and were confident these memories were true rather than false.

Many participants have recalled horrible false memories as part of carefully designed studies. These studies offer cautions to falsely accusing people of abuse and harassment and other crimes reported by eyewitnesses or even people convinced of the accuracy of their memory.

"We can't reliably distinguish true memories from false memories." (Loftus, 2013).

To learn more about faulty memory, see this talk by professor Elizabeth Loftus.




"Memory works a little bit more like a Wikipedia page: You can go in there and change it, but so can other people." Loftus (2013)

"Misinformation is everywhere." (Loftus, 2013)

"...we should all keep in mind...that memory, like liberty, is a fragile thing." (Loftus, 2013)


References

Loftus, E. (2013, September 23). How reliable is your memory. TED. Retrieved from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PB2OegI6wvI&index=21&list=PLFJ58a4FdeDHW97b7N1fWF8vqS4Victhf 

Loftus, E. F., Miller, D. G., & Burns, H. J. (1978). Semantic integration of verbal information into a visual memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 4(1), 19–31. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.4.1.19


Links to Connections

Checkout My Page    www.suttong.com

  

My Books  AMAZON          and             GOOGLE STORE

 

FOLLOW me on   FACEBOOK   Geoff W. Sutton   TWITTER  @Geoff.W.Sutton

 

PINTEREST  www.pinterest.com/GeoffWSutton

 

Articles: Academia   Geoff W Sutton   ResearchGate   Geoffrey W Sutton 

 

 

Subscribe to my Travel Channel on YouTube